HO REI, JETHRO & Anor v CHU JIAT BOON TIMOTHY
Key facts
| Court | District Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Don Ho |
| Charges / claim | Civil Procedure |
| Counsel | Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC, Tito Isaac & Co LLP, Ivan Lee Tze Chuen, Joel Raj Moosa, Megan Elizabeth Ong Sze Min |
Source: [2026] SGDC 100, District Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (5)
[2026] SGDC 100 explained
HO REI, JETHRO & Anor v CHU JIAT BOON TIMOTHY ([2026] SGDC 100) is a Singapore judgment decided by the District Court on 18 March 2026. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGDC 100 about?
HO REI, JETHRO & Anor v CHU JIAT BOON TIMOTHY ([2026] SGDC 100) is a District Court decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Rules of court — Approval to file application other than in single application pending trial”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Cases Cited (3)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGDC 100)