Cheang Hui Xuan
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Cheang Hui Xuan. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Cheang Hui Xuan appears as counsel of record in 5 reported Singapore judgments (2024–2026), before the High Court.
These cases are classified under Insolvency Law, Restitution and Admiralty and Shipping, and Cheang Hui Xuan acted for the applicant in 3 and the claimant in 1.
- Reported cases
- 5
- Courts
- High Court
- Period
- January 2024 to April 2026
Source: derived from 5 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Cheang Hui Xuan — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Cheang Hui Xuan appeared
- Counsel for the applicant
- 3 cases
- Counsel for the claimant
- 1 case
- Counsel for the non-party
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Application dismissed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 1 of the 5 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“For all the reasons above, I dismiss the present applications.”
High Court · 11 January 2024 · [2024] SGHC 6 · Counsel for the non-party · Application dismissed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Cheang Hui Xuan practice?
Insolvency Law 5 cases
Reported between January 2024 and April 2026.
Counsel for the applicant (3)
-
The court granted the necessary leave to both liquidators, dismissed An Wei's prayers for subrogation, and allowed its contribution claim of US$6,083,702.55 to rank as an unsecured claim in Da Shun's…
High Court · 8 April 2026 · [2026] SGHC 75 -
The High Court allowed the application in part: it recognised the US proceedings as foreign non-main proceedings, recognised Drivetrain as the company's foreign representative, and recognised and…
High Court · 19 November 2025 · [2025] SGHC 228 -
The court allowed ZPL's application in part.
High Court · 27 November 2024 · [2024] SGHC 298
Counsel for the claimant (1)
-
The court allowed the winding-up application and ordered the company to be wound up as unable to pay its debts, with the usual consequential orders, after allowing the amendments naming Ms Tan as…
High Court · 13 November 2024 · [2024] SGHC 291
Counsel for the non-party (1)
-
The High Court dismissed the applications, holding that an extension of moratoria where there is no prospect of restructuring lies outside s 64 of the IRDA.
High Court · 11 January 2024 · [2024] SGHC 6