Ho Wei Liang Sherman
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Ho Wei Liang Sherman. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Ho Wei Liang Sherman appears as counsel of record in 6 reported Singapore judgments (2025–2026), most often before the High Court.
These cases span several subject areas, most often Civil Procedure, and Ho Wei Liang Sherman acted for the appellant in 3 and the defendant in 2.
- Reported cases
- 6
- Courts
- High Court, High Court Registrar, High Court (Appellate Division)
- Period
- August 2025 to October 2026
Source: derived from 6 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Ho Wei Liang Sherman — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Ho Wei Liang Sherman appeared
- Counsel for the appellant
- 3 cases
- Counsel for the defendant
- 2 cases
- Counsel for the applicant
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Appeal allowed
- 2
- Application dismissed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 3 of the 6 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“I allow the appeal.”
High Court · 7 October 2026 · [2026] SGHC 207 · Counsel for the appellant · Appeal allowed -
“I allow the appeal.”
High Court · 30 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC 203 · Counsel for the appellant · Appeal allowed -
“The application is dismissed for the aforesaid reasons.”
High Court · 18 June 2026 · [2026] SGHC 132 · Counsel for the applicant · Application dismissed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Ho Wei Liang Sherman practice?
Civil Procedure 2 cases
Reported between August 2025 and August 2026.
Counsel for the appellant (3)
-
The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the one-week imprisonment term and substituted the maximum fine of $5,000, with one week's imprisonment in default; the five-year disqualification period…
High Court · 7 October 2026 · [2026] SGHC 207 -
The High Court allowed the appeal and reinstated the statutory demand.
High Court · 30 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC 203 -
The Appellate Division dismissed the appeal and agreed that the service was invalid.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 6 August 2025 · [2025] SGHC(A) 11
Counsel for the defendant (2)
-
The High Court allowed the claim and awarded Stamford Land $1,887,946.31 for its legal costs, with costs of the action and interest at 5.33% per annum from the date of judgment.
High Court · 29 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC 202 -
The court allowed the bank's application and struck out the originating claim and statement of claim in their entirety as an abuse of process.
High Court Registrar · 18 August 2026 · [2026] SGHCR 36
Counsel for the applicant (1)
-
The High Court dismissed the application and upheld the Board's decision on all four issues.
High Court · 18 June 2026 · [2026] SGHC 132