K

Ker Yanguang (Ke Yanguang)

Prolegis LLC · 2024–2025 Called to the Bar in 2014 8 appearances

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Ker Yanguang (Ke Yanguang). It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Ker Yanguang (Ke Yanguang) appears as counsel of record in 8 reported Singapore judgments (2024–2025), most often before the SGHC(I).

These cases are classified under Civil Procedure, Arbitration and Building and Construction Law, and Ker Yanguang (Ke Yanguang) acted for the claimant in 7 and the respondent in 1.

Reported cases
8
Courts
SGHC(I), SGHC(A)
Period
April 2024 to March 2025

Source: derived from 8 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Ker Yanguang (Ke Yanguang) — Reported Cases & Litigation Record

How Ker Yanguang (Ke Yanguang) appeared

Counsel for the claimant
7 cases
Counsel for the respondent
1 case

Recorded outcomes

Appeal allowed
1

Disposition recorded in 1 of 8 cases.

What the courts decided

[2024] SGHC(A) 32 Appeal allowed

“We allow the appeal and set aside the striking out of KTP as a party.”

THE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION STRATA TITLE PLAN NO. 4099 v KTP CONSULTANTS PTE LTD · SGHC(A) · · Counsel for the respondent

Parties in these cases

Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte. Ltd.6 P-H-O-E-N-I-X Petroleum Philippines, Inc (a.k.a. Phoenix Petroleum Philippines, Inc)5 Udenna Corporation4 PT Rajawali Corpora1 PT Rajawali Capital International1 FIC Properties Sdn Bhd1 KTP Consultants Pte Ltd1 The Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 40991

What areas of law does Ker Yanguang (Ke Yanguang) practice?

Civil Procedure 6 cases

Reported between April 2024 and March 2025.

Arbitration 3 cases

Reported between April 2024 and December 2024.

8
Appearances
2014
Year of Call
1
Firm
No
Senior Counsel

Counsel for the claimant (7)

Counsel for the respondent (1)

Rankings

Most active lawyers by reported court cases →