Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte. Ltd. v P-H-O-E-N-I-X Petroleum Philippines, Inc. (a.k.a. Phoenix Petroleum Philippines, Inc.) & Anor

[2024] SGHC(I) 27 Singapore International Commercial Court 27 September 2024 SIC/OA 23/2023 ( SIC/SUM 27/2024 ) 20 min read
2 cases cited (1 SG, 1 foreign) Cited by 1 case

Key facts

Court Singapore International Commercial Court
Decided
Judge Sir Henry Bernard Eder
Charges / claim Civil Procedure
Counsel Prolegis LLC, Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP, Chan Kit Munn Claudia, Charlene Wee Swee Ting, Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen, Jasmine Thing Khai Fang, Ker Yanguang (Ke Yanguang), Ng Kim Beng, Sim Daryl Larry

Source: [2024] SGHC(I) 27, Singapore International Commercial Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (9)

Parties (3)

Case Significance

Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd v P-H-O-E-N-I-X Petroleum Philippines, Inc (also known as Phoenix Petroleum Philippines, Inc) and another [2024] SGHC(I) 27 was decided by Sir Henry Bernard Eder IJ in the Singapore International Commercial Court in Originating Application No 23 of 2023 (Summons No 27 of 2024), heard on 22 August 2024 with judgment delivered on 27 September 2024. The proceedings were brought in the matter of section 19 of the International Arbitration Act 1994 and Order 23, Rule 10 of the Singapore International Commercial Court Rules 2021. By SIC/SUM 27/2024, the second defendant, Udenna Corporation ("Udenna"), applied to set aside the attempted service of the originating process in SIC/OA 23/2023 effected on it on 22 April 2024 by the Philippines' Central Authority under the Hague Convention of 15 November 1965 on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, and for a declaration that the originating process had not been served by reason of non-compliance with the SICC Rules.

The underlying originating application, OA 23, was the claimant Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd's ("PIMD") application to recognise and enforce a Final Award signed and dated 28 November 2023 in a SIAC arbitration. The catchwords identify the issues as civil procedure, service and setting aside. PIMD was represented by counsel from Prolegis LLC, including Chan Kit Munn Claudia, Charlene Wee Swee Ting, Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen and Ker Yanguang (Ke Yanguang), while the defendants were represented by counsel from Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP, including Ng Kim Beng, Jasmine Thing Khai Fang and Sim Daryl Larry.

[2024] SGHC(I) 27 explained

Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte. Ltd. v P-H-O-E-N-I-X Petroleum Philippines, Inc. (a.k.a. Phoenix Petroleum Philippines, Inc.) & Anor ([2024] SGHC(I) 27) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Singapore International Commercial Court on 27 September 2024. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2024] SGHC(I) 27 about?

Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte. Ltd. v P-H-O-E-N-I-X Petroleum Philippines, Inc. (a.k.a. Phoenix Petroleum Philippines, Inc.) & Anor ([2024] SGHC(I) 27) is a Singapore International Commercial Court decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Service — Setting aside”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2024] SGHC(I) 27 consider?

The judgment refers to Arbitration Act (Cap 10) and International Arbitration Act (Cap 143A). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

How influential is [2024] SGHC(I) 27?

Within this corpus, [2024] SGHC(I) 27 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.

What did Udenna Corporation seek in Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd v Phoenix Petroleum [2024] SGHC(I) 27?

In [2024] SGHC(I) 27, Udenna Corporation, the second defendant, sought to set aside the attempted service of the originating process effected on 22 April 2024 by the Philippines' Central Authority under the Hague Service Convention, and a declaration of non-service for non-compliance with the SICC Rules 2021.

What was the underlying application in [2024] SGHC(I) 27 about?

The underlying application, SIC/OA 23/2023, was Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd's application to recognise and enforce a SIAC Final Award dated 28 November 2023. Sir Henry Bernard Eder IJ decided the related service dispute in the Singapore International Commercial Court on 27 September 2024.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (2)

SG (1)
[2011] SGHC 150
UK (1)
[2020] EWHC 1962

Cited By (1)

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Referenced in

Statutes interpreted in this judgment

Legal concepts & references

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC(I) 27)