Ronald Wong Jian Jie (Huang Jianjie)
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Ronald Wong Jian Jie (Huang Jianjie). It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Ronald Wong Jian Jie (Huang Jianjie) appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Singapore judgments (2025–2026), before the High Court.
These cases span several subject areas, including Damages, Contract and Restitution, and Ronald Wong Jian Jie (Huang Jianjie) acted for the plaintiff in 2 and the respondent in 1.
- Reported cases
- 4
- Courts
- High Court
- Period
- July 2025 to September 2026
Source: derived from 4 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Ronald Wong Jian Jie (Huang Jianjie) — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Ronald Wong Jian Jie (Huang Jianjie) appeared
- Counsel for the plaintiff
- 2 cases
- Counsel for the respondent
- 1 case
- Counsel for the defendant
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Appeal allowed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 1 of the 4 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“I allow the appeal against the Decision, and restore the finding in the ID that the respondents had infringed s 34 of the Competition Act.”
High Court · 30 June 2026 · [2026] SGHC 139 · Counsel for the respondent · Appeal allowed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Ronald Wong Jian Jie (Huang Jianjie) practice?
Counsel for the plaintiff (2)
-
The High Court fixed costs in all three matters and ordered the defendant to pay the claimants $88,703.57, being the net total.
High Court · 23 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC 194 -
The court allowed the claim in part, assessing damages at US$10,126,158.43 rather than the present-day value the claimants sought, and ordered the defendant to pay that sum with interest at a rate to…
High Court · 9 February 2026 · [2026] SGHC 31
Counsel for the respondent (1)
-
Philip Jeyaretnam J allowed the appeal against the CAB's decision, set it aside and restored the CCS's finding that CNL and Gilmon had infringed s 34 of the Competition Act.
High Court · 30 June 2026 · [2026] SGHC 139
Counsel for the defendant (1)
-
The court allowed the claim in part.
High Court · 29 July 2025 · [2025] SGHC 144