S

Seah Lee Guan Collin

Collin Seah Law Practice · 2025Resource Law LLC · 2023–2025 Called to the Bar in 1993 4 appearances

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Seah Lee Guan Collin. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Seah Lee Guan Collin appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2025), most often before the SGCA.

These cases are classified under Admiralty and Shipping, Insolvency Law and Civil Procedure, and Seah Lee Guan Collin acted for the appellant in 3 and the plaintiff in 1.

Reported cases
4
Courts
SGCA, SGHC
Period
July 2023 to June 2025

Source: derived from 4 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Seah Lee Guan Collin — Reported Cases & Litigation Record

How Seah Lee Guan Collin appeared

Counsel for the appellant
3 cases
Counsel for the plaintiff
1 case

Recorded outcomes

Appeal dismissed
1
Appeal allowed
1

Disposition recorded in 2 of 4 cases.

What the courts decided

[2025] SGCA 29 Appeal dismissed

“…we dismiss the appeals.”

NATIXIS, SINGAPORE BRANCH v SESHADRI RAJAGOPALAN & 2 Ors · SGCA · · Counsel for the appellant
[2023] SGCA 20 Appeal allowed

“…we allow the appeal and find both parties equally to blame for the collision.”

Owner of the vessel(s) NAVIGATOR ARIES (IMO No. 9403762) v Owner of the vessel(s) LEO PERDANA (IMO No. 9363390) · SGCA · · Counsel for the appellant

Parties in these cases

Owner of the vessel “LEO PERDANA”2 Owner of the vessel “NAVIGATOR ARIES”2 Paresh Tribhovan Jotangia2 Seshadri Rajagopalan2 Societe Generale, Singapore Branch2 Natixis, Singapore Branch2 Nan Chiau Maritime (Pte) Ltd1 The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited1

What areas of law does Seah Lee Guan Collin practice?

4
Appearances
1993
Year of Call
2
Firms
No
Senior Counsel

Counsel for the appellant (3)

Counsel for the plaintiff (1)

Rankings

Most active lawyers by reported court cases →