S

Sonia Elizabeth Rajendra

Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP · 2023–2025 Called to the Bar in 2022 4 appearances

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Sonia Elizabeth Rajendra. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Sonia Elizabeth Rajendra appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2025), most often before the SGHC.

These cases span several subject areas, most often Admiralty and Shipping, Insolvency Law and Civil Procedure, and Sonia Elizabeth Rajendra acted for the respondent in 1 and the defendant in 1.

Reported cases
4
Courts
SGHC, SGCA
Period
June 2023 to June 2025

Source: derived from 4 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Sonia Elizabeth Rajendra — Reported Cases & Litigation Record

How Sonia Elizabeth Rajendra appeared

Counsel for the respondent
1 case
Counsel for the defendant
1 case
Counsel for the appellant
1 case
Counsel for the claimant
1 case

Recorded outcomes

Appeal dismissed
2

Disposition recorded in 2 of 4 cases.

What the courts decided

[2025] SGCA 29 Appeal dismissed

“…we dismiss the appeals.”

NATIXIS, SINGAPORE BRANCH v SESHADRI RAJAGOPALAN & 2 Ors · SGCA · · Counsel for the respondent
[2024] SGHC 100 Appeal dismissed

“I dismiss the appeal for all the reasons I have explained above.”

LIM CHEE SENG v PHANG YEW KIAT · SGHC · · Counsel for the appellant

Parties in these cases

Paresh Tribhovan Jotangia2 Seshadri Rajagopalan2 Societe Generale, Singapore Branch2 Natixis, Singapore Branch2 Tiong Woon Offshore Pte Ltd1 Advanced Submarine Networks Pte Ltd1 Cova Group Holdings Ltd1 Nan Chiau Maritime (Pte) Ltd1

What areas of law does Sonia Elizabeth Rajendra practice?

4
Appearances
2022
Year of Call
1
Firm
No
Senior Counsel

Counsel for the respondent (1)

Counsel for the defendant (1)

Counsel for the appellant (1)

Counsel for the claimant (1)

Rankings

Most active lawyers by reported court cases →