Tan Cheng Kiong
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Tan Cheng Kiong. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Tan Cheng Kiong appears as counsel of record in 5 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the High Court.
These cases span several subject areas, most often Criminal Procedure and Sentencing and Companies, and Tan Cheng Kiong acted for the appellant in 2 and the defendant in 1.
- Reported cases
- 5
- Courts
- High Court, High Court (Family Division)
- Period
- July 2023 to May 2026
Source: derived from 5 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Tan Cheng Kiong — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Tan Cheng Kiong appeared
- Counsel for the appellant
- 2 cases
- Counsel for the defendant
- 1 case
- Counsel for the respondent
- 1 case
- Counsel for the plaintiff
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Appeal dismissed
- 2
Outcome recorded for 2 of the 5 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“I dismissed the appeal.”
High Court · 18 May 2026 · [2026] SGHC 107 · Counsel for the appellant · Appeal dismissed -
“I dismissed the appeal.”
High Court (Family Division) · 14 July 2023 · [2023] SGHCF 31 · Counsel for the appellant · Appeal dismissed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Tan Cheng Kiong practice?
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing 2 cases
Reported between July 2023 and May 2026.
Companies 2 cases
Reported between January 2024 and December 2024.
Counsel for the appellant (2)
-
Kannan Ramesh JAD dismissed the appeal against sentence, finding no basis for appellate intervention.
High Court · 18 May 2026 · [2026] SGHC 107 -
The High Court (Family Division) dismissed the appeal and upheld the order for 21 months at the Singapore Girls' Home.
High Court (Family Division) · 14 July 2023 · [2023] SGHCF 31
Counsel for the defendant (1)
-
The High Court dismissed all of Duke Bakery's claims against the three defendants and dismissed Mdm Chng's counterclaim.
High Court · 13 December 2024 · [2024] SGHC 318
Counsel for the respondent (1)
-
Valerie Thean J dismissed both OA 637 and SUM 2196.
High Court · 9 January 2024 · [2024] SGHC 1
Counsel for the plaintiff (1)
-
The court declined to order a stay of implementation and distribution and refused the plaintiff's oral application.
High Court · 18 August 2023 · [2023] SGHC 228