Leading Mental Disorders and Treatment Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore
4 reported cases · January 2024 to June 2026
Updated
What did Singapore courts decide in Mental Disorders and Treatment?
Singapore courts issued 4 reported Mental Disorders and Treatment judgments (2024–2026), most in the High Court (Family Division) (2), of the 2 whose outcome could be read from the judgment, Appeal dismissed (1) and Application allowed in part (1). This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.
Compiled from 4 reported Mental Disorders and Treatment judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.
Outcome data updated
Across 4 reported Mental Disorders and Treatment judgments in Singapore courts (January 2024 to June 2026). The lists below count how often named firms and lawyers appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.
Overview
Mental Disorders and Treatment appears in 4 reported Singapore judgments (2024–2026).
Which law firms handle the most Mental Disorders and Treatment cases in Singapore?
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (2 cases), Tan Kok Quan Partnership (2 cases) and K&L Gates Straits Law LLC (1 case) appear as a firm on record in reported Mental Disorders and Treatment cases between January 2024 and June 2026. 7 firms appeared in Mental Disorders and Treatment cases during this period.
Who are the leading Mental Disorders and Treatment lawyers in Singapore?
Teo Su Ning Gillian (2 cases), Zhu Ming-Ren Wilson (2 cases) and Joan Peiyun Lim-Casanova (1 case) appear as counsel in reported Mental Disorders and Treatment cases between January 2024 and June 2026.
Which judges handle the most Mental Disorders and Treatment cases in Singapore?
Choo Han Teck (1 case), Sundaresh Menon (1 case) and Belinda Ang Saw Ean (1 case) appear on the bench in reported Mental Disorders and Treatment cases between January 2024 and June 2026.
How many Mental Disorders and Treatment cases are reported in Singapore courts?
4 reported Singapore judgments (2024–2026) involve Mental Disorders and Treatment.
Case Volume by Year
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
Mental Capacity — Whether donee’s prior conduct is relevant to determination of P’s best interest 1 case
-
The High Court dismissed the appeal.
High Court (Family Division) · 4 June 2026 · [2026] SGHCF 18
Management of patients’ property and affairs 1 case
-
The High Court allowed the children's appeal in DCA 121 and dismissed Z's appeal in DCA 123, so X and Y remained joint deputies for P's personal welfare, property and affairs.
High Court (Family Division) · 8 April 2025 · [2025] SGHCF 22
Management of patients' property and affairs 1 case
-
The Court of Appeal allowed the application in part.
Court of Appeal · 14 February 2024 · [2024] SGCA 4
Inquiries into mental disorders 1 case
-
Valerie Thean J dismissed both OA 637 and SUM 2196.
High Court · 9 January 2024 · [2024] SGHC 1
Key Statutes
Court Distribution
Cases
-
The High Court dismissed the appeal.
High Court (Family Division) · 4 June 2026 · [2026] SGHCF 18 -
The High Court allowed the children's appeal in DCA 121 and dismissed Z's appeal in DCA 123, so X and Y remained joint deputies for P's personal welfare, property and affairs.
High Court (Family Division) · 8 April 2025 · [2025] SGHCF 22 -
The Court of Appeal allowed the application in part.
Court of Appeal · 14 February 2024 · [2024] SGCA 4 -
Valerie Thean J dismissed both OA 637 and SUM 2196.
High Court · 9 January 2024 · [2024] SGHC 1
Methodology & disclaimer
Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Singapore court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.