Wayne Yeo (Yang Weien)
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Wayne Yeo (Yang Weien). It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Wayne Yeo (Yang Weien) appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the High Court (Family Division).
These cases span several subject areas, most often Civil Procedure, Contract and Tort, and Wayne Yeo (Yang Weien) acted for the respondent in 1 and the applicant in 1.
- Reported cases
- 4
- Courts
- High Court (Family Division), High Court Registrar, High Court (Appellate Division), High Court
- Period
- September 2023 to June 2026
Source: derived from 4 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Wayne Yeo (Yang Weien) — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Wayne Yeo (Yang Weien) appeared
- Counsel for the respondent
- 1 case
- Counsel for the applicant
- 1 case
- Counsel for the appellant
- 1 case
- Counsel for the plaintiff
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Appeal dismissed
- 2
Outcome recorded for 2 of the 4 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“The appeal is therefore dismissed.”
High Court (Family Division) · 4 June 2026 · [2026] SGHCF 18 · Counsel for the respondent · Appeal dismissed -
“…we dismiss the appeal and award costs to Hanjin in the sum of S$60,000 including disbursements.”
High Court (Appellate Division) · 16 September 2024 · [2024] SGHC(A) 26 · Counsel for the appellant · Appeal dismissed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Wayne Yeo (Yang Weien) practice?
Counsel for the respondent (1)
-
The High Court dismissed the appeal.
High Court (Family Division) · 4 June 2026 · [2026] SGHCF 18
Counsel for the applicant (1)
-
The Assistant Registrar ordered costs for the Singapore lawyers' work at S$250,000 plus GST of S$21,096.40, S$4,000 plus S$4,645.18 and English fees of £8,400 and £3,000 for the assessment,…
High Court Registrar · 20 June 2025 · [2025] SGHCR 18
Counsel for the appellant (1)
-
The Appellate Division dismissed the appeal and ordered Seatrium to pay Hanjin costs of S$60,000 including disbursements, with the usual consequential orders.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 16 September 2024 · [2024] SGHC(A) 26
Counsel for the plaintiff (1)
-
S Mohan J found that the works were defective and that Hanjin breached the sub-contract, but held that no tortious duty of care arose and that the Side Letter precluded the claim.
High Court · 20 September 2023 · [2023] SGHC 264