Wayne Yeo
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Wayne Yeo. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Wayne Yeo appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the High Court.
These cases span several subject areas, most often Civil Procedure, and Wayne Yeo acted for the defendant in 2 and the respondent in 1.
- Reported cases
- 4
- Courts
- High Court, High Court (Appellate Division)
- Period
- February 2023 to September 2026
Source: derived from 4 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Wayne Yeo — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Wayne Yeo appeared
- Counsel for the defendant
- 2 cases
- Counsel for the respondent
- 1 case
- Counsel for the plaintiff
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Appeal dismissed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 1 of the 4 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“…we dismiss the appeals by ES in their entirety.”
High Court (Appellate Division) · 9 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC(A) 23 · Counsel for the respondent · Appeal dismissed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Wayne Yeo practice?
Counsel for the respondent (1)
-
The Appellate Division dismissed the appeals in their entirety, leaving the striking out and the judge's costs orders undisturbed.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 9 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC(A) 23
Counsel for the defendant (2)
-
Chua Lee Ming J allowed all three appeals, set aside the Assistant Registrar's orders and struck out Ever Strategy's claims against all the defendants.
High Court · 9 April 2026 · [2026] SGHC 76 -
Kwek Mean Luck J dismissed the plaintiff's appeal, leaving in place the Assistant Registrar's order granting the 2nd and 3rd defendants leave to amend their Defence.
High Court · 26 November 2024 · [2024] SGHC 299
Counsel for the plaintiff (1)
-
Andre Maniam J dismissed CSO's appeal, but limited the parts of the emails CSP could rely on to those relevant to rebutting CSO's two assertions; the rest remained privileged.
High Court · 8 February 2023 · [2023] SGHC 24