Drivetrain, LLC

High Court

[2025] SGHC 228 · HC/OA 797/2025 · cites 9 cases (8 Singapore, 1 foreign)

Step 1: What happened

Near Intelligence Pte Ltd, incorporated in Singapore in February 2020, was part of a data intelligence group whose other members were Delaware companies headquartered in California. On 8 December 2023 the four group companies filed for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, and the Delaware bankruptcy court approved a sale of substantially all their assets and then, in March 2024, confirmed a combined disclosure statement and plan. A litigation trust was set up with Drivetrain, LLC as trustee; the plan terminated the companies' directors and gave Drivetrain the powers of a board, and a July 2025 order authorised it to act as foreign representative abroad. The sale contemplated a transfer of the Singapore company's shares in its Indian subsidiary to the purchaser, which had not happened, allegedly because the Indian subsidiary's directors would not cooperate, and Drivetrain had begun proceedings in India.

In Originating Application No 797 of 2025, Drivetrain applied under s 252 and the Third Schedule of the IRDA for recognition of the US proceedings as foreign non-main proceedings, recognition of itself as foreign representative, recognition and enforcement of the confirmation order and plan, and an order entrusting it with the company's Singapore assets. The court required notice to all creditors and directors and further evidence on the company's centre of main interests (COMI) and on Drivetrain's purpose; no one responded to the notice.

Step 2: What the court had to decide

  1. Whether the court had jurisdiction under Art 4(2) of the Model Law when the company no longer had assets in Singapore.
  2. Whether the US proceedings should be recognised, and whether as foreign main or non-main proceedings given where the company's COMI lay.
  3. Whether the US confirmation order and plan should be recognised and enforced in Singapore.
  4. Whether Drivetrain should be permitted to withdraw its request to be entrusted with the company's Singapore assets.

Step 3: How the court reasoned

The court said applicants should explain clearly why recognition is sought, since that bears on the public policy exception. Drivetrain's purpose, clarified at the hearing, was to align Singapore with the US orders, because the directors still listed in Singapore would otherwise appear to retain authority. The material on the Indian proceedings proved largely beside the point, and nothing engaged the public policy exception.

The Indian shares were located in India, where the subsidiary was incorporated and its register kept, and Drivetrain confirmed the company now had no Singapore assets. Jurisdiction nonetheless existed because the company had carried on business in Singapore until the US filing, and because Singapore was the appropriate forum to clarify who controlled the company.

Chapter 11 proceedings qualify as foreign proceedings, Drivetrain was a foreign representative and the procedural requirements were met. The registered office presumption placed the COMI in Singapore: until recently the company had Singapore bank accounts, an office, employees and many Singapore contracts, and no other jurisdiction had a stronger connection. With the COMI in Singapore and an establishment in the US, the proceedings were recognised as non-main.

Following earlier Singapore decisions recognising US Chapter 11 plans, the court found the US process had observed due process and protected creditors, satisfying Art 22(1), and recognition would aid fair administration. As there was no Singapore property, the entrustment order was unnecessary; recognition of the confirmation order still gave Drivetrain authority, as far as Singapore was concerned, to deal with the Indian shares.

From the judgment

“Nonetheless, until the applicant explains what its motivations are for bringing a recognition application, the court would simply not be in any meaningful position to evaluate whether the applicant’s purpose is consistent with the goals of the Model Law or entirely collateral to it.”

[2025] SGHC 228 at [19]

Step 4: The order

The High Court allowed the application in part: it recognised the US proceedings as foreign non-main proceedings, recognised Drivetrain as the company's foreign representative, and recognised and enforced the confirmation order, the combined disclosure statement and plan and the notice of effective date in Singapore, while granting Drivetrain permission to withdraw the request to be entrusted with the company's Singapore assets.

Court record

Key facts

Court High Court
Decided
Judge Mohamed Faizal
What the case was about Insolvency Law

Source: [2025] SGHC 228, High Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Judge

Parties

  • Drivetrain LLC Applicant
  • Near Intelligence Inc Third party
  • Near Intelligence LLC Third party
  • Near Intelligence Pte Ltd Third party
  • Near North America Inc Third party

Counsel

Statutes cited

Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
Restructuring and Dissolution Act

Cases cited (9)

SG (1)
SLR (7)
  • [2019] 4 SLR 1343
  • [2020] 4 SLR 680
  • [2023] 2 SLR 421
  • [2023] 3 SLR 250
  • [2024] 3 SLR 254
  • [2025] 1 SLR 432
  • [2025] 3 SLR 1536
UK (1)
  • [1996] 1 WLR 387

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments on the same subject, most closely matched first.

Referenced in

Statutes interpreted in this judgment

Read the full judgment

The judgment itself is on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 228)

This page sets out what the court decided, for learning. It is information, not legal advice. Disclaimer