CZT v CZU
Key facts
| Court | Singapore International Commercial Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judges | Chua Lee Ming, Dominique Hascher, Sir Jeremy Cooke |
| Charges / claim | Civil Procedure, Arbitration |
| Counsel | PK Wong & Nair LLC, Tham Lijing LLC, Toby Landau, WongPartnership LLP, Claire Lim, Joel Wang Pinwen, Koh Swee Yen, Lim Qiu Yi, Regina, Nair Suresh Sukumaran, Pang Yi Ching Alessa, Tan Tse Hsien, Bryan (Chen Shixian), Teo Wei Kiat Samuel, Tham Lijing, Toby Thomas Landau |
Source: [2023] SGHC(I) 11, Singapore International Commercial Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (3)
Counsel (14)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
CZT v CZU [2023] SGHC(I) 11 is a reserved judgment of the Singapore International Commercial Court, delivered on 28 June 2023 in Originating Summons No 1 of 2023, with Chua Lee Ming J delivering the judgment of the court sitting with Dominique Hascher IJ and Sir Jeremy Cooke IJ. In arbitration proceedings commenced by the defendant against the plaintiff, the arbitral tribunal issued an award against the plaintiff by a majority, with the minority issuing a dissenting opinion making several serious allegations against the majority. The plaintiff applied to set aside the award, and the three summonses were applications for orders that the three members of the arbitration tribunal produce their records of deliberations; the court dismissed the applications, addressing the confidentiality of records of deliberations under the International Arbitration Act.
What was CZT v CZU [2023] SGHC(I) 11 about?
It was a Singapore International Commercial Court judgment delivered on 28 June 2023 by Chua Lee Ming J, sitting with Dominique Hascher IJ and Sir Jeremy Cooke IJ, on the plaintiff's applications for the arbitral tribunal to produce its records of deliberations while seeking to set aside the award.
What did the court decide in CZT v CZU [2023] SGHC(I) 11?
The court dismissed the plaintiff's three summonses seeking orders that the three members of the arbitration tribunal produce their records of deliberations, the dispute arising after a majority award and a dissenting opinion making serious allegations against the majority.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (3)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments on the same subject, most closely matched first.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2023] SGHC(I) 11)