CZT v CZU

[2023] SGHC(I) 11 Singapore International Commercial Court 28 June 2023 SIC/OS 1/2023 ( HC/SUM 790/2023,HC/SUM 788/2023,HC/SUM 789/2023 ) 35 min read
3 cases cited (2 SG, 1 foreign) Cited by 2 cases

Key facts

Court Singapore International Commercial Court
Decided
Judges Chua Lee Ming, Dominique Hascher, Sir Jeremy Cooke
Charges / claim Civil Procedure, Arbitration
Counsel PK Wong & Nair LLC, Tham Lijing LLC, Toby Landau, WongPartnership LLP, Claire Lim, Joel Wang Pinwen, Koh Swee Yen, Lim Qiu Yi, Regina, Nair Suresh Sukumaran, Pang Yi Ching Alessa, Tan Tse Hsien, Bryan (Chen Shixian), Teo Wei Kiat Samuel, Tham Lijing, Toby Thomas Landau

Source: [2023] SGHC(I) 11, Singapore International Commercial Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (3)

Counsel (14)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

CZT v CZU [2023] SGHC(I) 11 is a reserved judgment of the Singapore International Commercial Court, delivered on 28 June 2023 in Originating Summons No 1 of 2023, with Chua Lee Ming J delivering the judgment of the court sitting with Dominique Hascher IJ and Sir Jeremy Cooke IJ. In arbitration proceedings commenced by the defendant against the plaintiff, the arbitral tribunal issued an award against the plaintiff by a majority, with the minority issuing a dissenting opinion making several serious allegations against the majority. The plaintiff applied to set aside the award, and the three summonses were applications for orders that the three members of the arbitration tribunal produce their records of deliberations; the court dismissed the applications, addressing the confidentiality of records of deliberations under the International Arbitration Act.

[2023] SGHC(I) 11 explained

CZT v CZU ([2023] SGHC(I) 11) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Singapore International Commercial Court on 28 June 2023. It is categorised under Civil Procedure and Arbitration. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 2 other reported Singapore judgments, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2023] SGHC(I) 11 about?

CZT v CZU ([2023] SGHC(I) 11) is a Singapore International Commercial Court decision from 2023. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Production of documents (SICC) — Objections” and “Arbitration — Confidentiality — Confidentiality of records of deliberations”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2023] SGHC(I) 11 consider?

The judgment refers to Arbitration Act (Cap 10), International Arbitration Act (Cap 143A), and International Arbitration Act (Cap 10). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

How influential is [2023] SGHC(I) 11?

Within this corpus, [2023] SGHC(I) 11 has been cited by 2 later reported Singapore judgments. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.

What was CZT v CZU [2023] SGHC(I) 11 about?

It was a Singapore International Commercial Court judgment delivered on 28 June 2023 by Chua Lee Ming J, sitting with Dominique Hascher IJ and Sir Jeremy Cooke IJ, on the plaintiff's applications for the arbitral tribunal to produce its records of deliberations while seeking to set aside the award.

What did the court decide in CZT v CZU [2023] SGHC(I) 11?

The court dismissed the plaintiff's three summonses seeking orders that the three members of the arbitration tribunal produce their records of deliberations, the dispute arising after a majority award and a dissenting opinion making serious allegations against the majority.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (3)

SLR (2)
[2009] 1 SLR(R) 945 [2019] 5 SLR 1
UK (1)
[2017] EWHC 148

Cited By (2)

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Referenced in

Statutes interpreted in this judgment

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2023] SGHC(I) 11)