CZT v CZU
Key facts
| Court | Singapore International Commercial Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judges | Chua Lee Ming, Dominique Hascher, Sir Jeremy Cooke |
| Charges / claim | Arbitration |
| Counsel | PK Wong & Nair LLC, WongPartnership LLP, Claire Lim, Joel Wang Pinwen, Koh Swee Yen, Nair Suresh Sukumaran, Pang Yi Ching Alessa, Tan Tse Hsien, Bryan (Chen Shixian), Teo Wei Kiat Samuel |
Source: [2023] SGHC(I) 22, Singapore International Commercial Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Counsel (9)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
CZT v CZU [2023] SGHC(I) 22 is a judgment of the Singapore International Commercial Court delivered by Chua Lee Ming J on 27 November 2023, sitting with Dominique Hascher IJ and Sir Jeremy Cooke IJ. The plaintiff applied to set aside an arbitral award issued in ICC arbitration proceedings seated in Singapore and conducted under the Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce 2017. The dispute arose from a Provisional Contract under which the plaintiff was to deliver material packages for a third-party contractor to construct products for the defendant. The judgment concerns recourse against an arbitral award under the Arbitration Act and International Arbitration Act and has been cited 14 times.
[2023] SGHC(I) 22 explained
CZT v CZU ([2023] SGHC(I) 22) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Singapore International Commercial Court on 27 November 2023. It is categorised under Arbitration. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2023] SGHC(I) 22 about?
CZT v CZU ([2023] SGHC(I) 22) is a Singapore International Commercial Court decision from 2023. Its published catchwords are “Arbitration — Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2023] SGHC(I) 22 consider?
The judgment refers to Arbitration Act (Cap 10), International Arbitration Act (Cap 143A), and International Arbitration Act (Cap 10). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2023] SGHC(I) 22 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2023] SGHC 275 and [2023] SGHC(I) 11. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
How influential is [2023] SGHC(I) 22?
Within this corpus, [2023] SGHC(I) 22 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
What was the application in CZT v CZU [2023] SGHC(I) 22?
The plaintiff applied to the Singapore International Commercial Court to set aside an arbitral award issued in ICC arbitration proceedings seated in Singapore under the ICC Rules 2017, decided by Chua Lee Ming J on 27 November 2023.
Which judges sat in CZT v CZU [2023] SGHC(I) 22?
The Singapore International Commercial Court panel comprised Chua Lee Ming J, who delivered the judgment, together with Dominique Hascher IJ and Sir Jeremy Cooke IJ, in Originating Summons No 1 of 2023.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (14)
Cited By (1)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2023] SGHC(I) 22)