SIR CORNELIUS SEAN SULLIVAN V HILL CAPITAL PTE. LTD. & ANOR

[2024] SGHC 157 High Court (General Division) 20 June 2024 • HC/OA 820/2023 ( HC/RA 14/2024,HC/RA 15/2024 ) • 18 min read
4 cases cited (2 SG, 2 foreign)

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (16)

Parties (3)

Case Significance

Sullivan, Sir Cornelius Sean v Hill Capital Pte Ltd and another [2024] SGHC 157 was a decision of the General Division of the High Court delivered by Chua Lee Ming J on 20 June 2024 in Originating Application No 820 of 2023 (Registrar's Appeals No 14 and 15 of 2024). The first and second respondents had applied in HC/SUM 2819/2023 to stay the originating application on the ground that Cyprus was the more appropriate forum; the Assistant Registrar dismissed that application, and the respondents appealed in HC/RA 14/2024 and HC/RA 15/2024.

As explained in the judgment, the case involved trust deeds that permitted the trustees to change the proper law and the forum for administration of the trusts, raising the question of which proper law and forum applied to alleged breaches where the proper law and forum had been changed after the alleged breaches. The applicant, Sir Cornelius Sean Sullivan, was a purported beneficiary of a trust created by his late father, Mr Joseph Sullivan; the first respondent, Hill Capital Pte Ltd, was a Singapore trust company, and the second respondent was Ms Ban Su Mei. The applicant was represented by counsel from Drew & Napier LLC and the respondents by Davinder Singh and Tan Chee Meng, with counsel from Davinder Singh Chambers LLC and WongPartnership LLP.

Summary

Sir Cornelius Sean Sullivan, a purported beneficiary of trusts created by his late father and established in the Isle of Man, brought proceedings in the General Division of the High Court against Hill Capital Pte Ltd (a Singapore trust company that had become trustee and changed the proper law and forum for administration to Singapore) and its sole shareholder and director; the respondents applied to stay the proceedings on the ground that Cyprus was the more appropriate forum. The issues concerned choice of jurisdiction, the proper law applicable to alleged breaches in the administration of the trusts, and the trustees' duties and retirement. The court agreed with the Assistant Registrar that there was no reason to stay the proceedings, dismissed the respondents' appeals, and ordered the respondents to pay the applicant costs fixed at $12,000 per respondent.

What was the central issue in Sullivan v Hill Capital [2024] SGHC 157?

The case concerned trust deeds permitting trustees to change the proper law and forum for administration, and which proper law and forum applied to alleged breaches that occurred before those changes. It also addressed a stay application arguing Cyprus was the more appropriate forum.

Who were the parties in Sullivan v Hill Capital [2024] SGHC 157?

The applicant was Sir Cornelius Sean Sullivan, a purported beneficiary of a trust created by his late father Mr Joseph Sullivan. The respondents were Hill Capital Pte Ltd, a Singapore trust company, and Ms Ban Su Mei, in proceedings before Chua Lee Ming J.

Cases Cited (4)

SG (1)
[2017] SGHC 90
SLR (1)
[2020] 2 SLR 638
UK (2)
[1987] AC 460 [2014] UKPC 40

Referenced in

Legal concepts & references

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC 157)