The Law Society of Singapore v Seah Zhen Wei Paul
Outcome
Sentence imposedwe sentenced him to three-years’ suspension commencing on 1 June 2024. In OA 11, we sentenced Mr Seah to three-years’ suspension commencing on 17 August 2024.172 We ordered Mr Seah to pay the Law Society costs of $10,000, inclusive of disbursements, in OA 11, which sum reflected his concession on liability at the start of the hearing.
Source: [2024] SGHC 224, High Court (General Division), decided 2 September 2024. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judges | Belinda Ang Saw Ean, See Kee Oon, Woo Bih Li |
| Charges / claim | Legal Profession |
| Outcome | Sentence imposed |
| Sentence / award | $10,000 |
| Counsel | Abraham Vergis, Chan Kah Keen Melvin, Davinder Singh s/o Amar Singh, Pillai Pradeep G |
Source: [2024] SGHC 224, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Counsel (4)
Case Significance
The Law Society of Singapore v Seah Zhen Wei Paul [2024] SGHC 224 was decided by a Court of 3 Supreme Court Judges, comprising Belinda Ang Saw Ean JCA (delivering the grounds of decision of the court), Woo Bih Li JAD and See Kee Oon JAD, with the matter heard on 5 and 9 April 2024 and the decision issued on 4 September 2024. The proceedings comprised two applications, C3J/OA 11 of 2023 ("OA 11") and C3J/OA 12 of 2023 ("OA 12"), brought by the Law Society of Singapore against Mr Seah Zhen Wei Paul and Mr Rethnam Chandra Mohan respectively, for the respondents to be sanctioned under s 83(1) of the Legal Profession Act 1966 (Cap 161, 2009 Rev Ed).
According to the grounds of decision, Mr Seah was called to the Singapore bar on 20 May 2006, was an advocate and solicitor for around 14 years, and was at all material times a partner in Tan Kok Quan Partnership. Mr Mohan was called to the bar on 21 March 1992, was an advocate and solicitor for around 28 years, and was at all material times practising as a partner in Rajah and Tann Singapore LLP. The matter concerned professional conduct and breach, and the court referred to the Companies Act, the Evidence Act, the Interpretation Act and the Legal Profession Act. In OA 11 the Law Society was represented by Pillai Pradeep G, and Abraham Vergis SC appeared for Mr Seah; in OA 12 Chan Kah Keen Melvin represented the Law Society, with Davinder Singh s/o Amar Singh also appearing as counsel for a respondent.
[2024] SGHC 224 explained
The Law Society of Singapore v Seah Zhen Wei Paul ([2024] SGHC 224) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 2 September 2024. It is categorised under Legal Profession. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2024] SGHC 224 about?
The Law Society of Singapore v Seah Zhen Wei Paul ([2024] SGHC 224) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Legal Profession — Professional conduct — Breach”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2024] SGHC 224 consider?
The judgment refers to Companies Act (Cap 50), Evidence Act (Cap 97), Interpretation Act (Cap 1), and Legal Profession Act (Cap 161). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2024] SGHC 224 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2024] SGHC 55. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
Who were the respondents in Law Society of Singapore v Seah Zhen Wei Paul [2024] SGHC 224?
The respondents were Mr Seah Zhen Wei Paul, a partner in Tan Kok Quan Partnership called to the bar on 20 May 2006, and Mr Rethnam Chandra Mohan, a partner in Rajah and Tann Singapore LLP, each facing sanction under s 83(1) of the Legal Profession Act.
Which judges heard Law Society of Singapore v Seah Zhen Wei Paul [2024] SGHC 224?
The matter was heard by a Court of 3 Supreme Court Judges comprising Belinda Ang Saw Ean JCA, who delivered the grounds of decision, together with Woo Bih Li JAD and See Kee Oon JAD, in C3J/OA 11 and 12 of 2023, with the decision issued on 4 September 2024.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (30)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC 224)