XSN v XSO
Key facts
| Court | Family Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Muhammad Hidhir Bin Abdul Majid |
| Charges / claim | Family Law |
| Counsel | A.W. Law LLC, I.R.B. Law LLP, Caryn Lee, Diyana Binte Atan, Muhammad Hasif Bin Abdul Aziz |
Source: [2025] SGFC 106, Family Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (5)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
[2025] SGFC 106 is a Family Court decision dated 14 October 2025 concerning Family Law, specifically addressing breach of court order. The judgment was delivered by Muhammad Hidhir Bin Abdul Majid. The case was brought by XSN (plaintiff) against XSO (defendant). Legal representation was provided by A.W. Law LLC and I.R.B. Law LLP. The judgment cites 4 cases (3 Singapore, 1 foreign).
[2025] SGFC 106 explained
XSN v XSO ([2025] SGFC 106) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Family Court on 14 October 2025. It is categorised under Family Law. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGFC 106 about?
XSN v XSO ([2025] SGFC 106) is a Family Court decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Family Law – Breach of Court Order – Committal”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Summary
Following a divorce, the wife applied for committal against her ex-husband for contempt of court for failing to return two dogs pursuant to a consent order stating 'each party shall retain their respective assets in their own names.' The key issue was whether the consent order was sufficiently clear and unambiguous to support committal proceedings for the return of the dogs. The court dismissed the application, finding the order was ambiguous as there was no evidence the parties had applied their minds to the ownership of the dogs when recording the consent order.
What was decided in [2025] SGFC 106?
[2025] SGFC 106 (XSN v XSO) is a Family Court decision from 14 October 2025 addressing Family Law, specifically breach of court order. The judgment was delivered by Muhammad Hidhir Bin Abdul Majid.
Who were the parties in XSN v XSO ([2025] SGFC 106)?
The plaintiff in [2025] SGFC 106 was XSN, and the defendant was XSO. Legal representation included I.R.B. Law LLP and A.W. Law LLC. The case was decided on 14 October 2025 in the Family Court.
Which judge decided [2025] SGFC 106?
[2025] SGFC 106 was delivered by Muhammad Hidhir Bin Abdul Majid in the Family Court on 14 October 2025. The case concerned Family Law.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGFC 106 cite?
[2025] SGFC 106 cites 4 prior decisions, including 1 from foreign jurisdictions.
Cases Cited (4)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGFC 106)