DJY v DJZ & Anor
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Wong Li Kok, Alex |
| Charges / claim | Civil Procedure |
| Counsel | Drew & Napier LLC, WongPartnership LLP, Desiree Chong Ci En, Foo Hsien Weng, Hing Shan Shan Blossom, Jill Ann Koh Ying (Xu Ying), Leau Jun Li, Lim Mingguan, Lin Weiqi Wendy, Lu En Hui, Sarah, Wee Jong Xuan |
Source: [2025] SGHC 59, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (11)
Parties (3)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 59 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 3 April 2025 concerning Civil Procedure, specifically addressing erinford injunctions. The judgment was delivered by Wong Li Kok, Alex. The case was brought by DJY (applicant) against DKA and others (respondent). Legal representation was provided by WongPartnership LLP and Drew & Napier LLC. The judgment cites 12 cases (10 Singapore, 2 foreign).
[2025] SGHC 59 explained
DJY v DJZ & Anor ([2025] SGHC 59) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 3 April 2025. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC 59 about?
DJY v DJZ & Anor ([2025] SGHC 59) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Erinford injunctions”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2025] SGHC 59 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2024] SGHC 301, [2024] SGHC 47, and [2024] SGHC 5. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
Summary
An applicant sought to set aside an arbitral award on the basis that the tribunal had exceeded its jurisdiction and breached natural justice in a shareholders' agreement dispute. The court dismissed the application, finding the tribunal's interpretation of the agreement's exit framework and its conclusions on the promoters' obligations fell within the scope of the parties' submissions and that no breach of the fair hearing rule was established.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 59?
[2025] SGHC 59 (DJY v DJZ & Anor) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 3 April 2025 addressing Civil Procedure, specifically erinford injunctions. The judgment was delivered by Wong Li Kok, Alex.
Who were the parties in DJY v DJZ & Anor ([2025] SGHC 59)?
The applicant in [2025] SGHC 59 was DJY, and the respondent was DKA, DJZ. Legal representation included WongPartnership LLP and Drew & Napier LLC. The case was decided on 3 April 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 59?
[2025] SGHC 59 was delivered by Wong Li Kok, Alex in the High Court (General Division) on 3 April 2025. The case concerned Civil Procedure.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 59 cite?
[2025] SGHC 59 cites 12 prior decisions, including 2 from foreign jurisdictions.
Cases Cited (12)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 59)