Public Prosecutor v Syed Faizal Bin Syed Abubakar
Key facts
| Court | District Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Koh Jiaying |
| Charges / claim | Criminal Procedure and Sentencing, Section 55A(1)(a)(i) Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act 1992 read with Section 55A(1)(b)(ii) |
| Counsel | Attorney-General's Chambers, Public Defender's Office, Chong Shou En, Matthew Choo |
Source: [2026] SGDC 119, District Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (4)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
Public Prosecutor v Syed Faizal Bin Syed Abubakar [2026] SGDC 119 was decided in the District Court by District Judge Koh Jiaying on 16 April 2026, with sentence imposed on 9 March 2026. The 45-year-old accused pleaded guilty to disclosing Singpass credentials under section 8A(1) of the Computer Misuse Act 1993 and to a charge under section 55A(1)(a)(i) of the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act 1992 after a person unknown was enabled to operate his GXS Bank account, with unauthorised access and cheating charges taken into consideration. The court applied the Sentencing Advisory Panel's Guidelines for Scams-Related Offences, uplifted for gain and for funds above $100,000, and reduced the sentence by 30% for the plea. It imposed 7 months and 2 weeks' imprisonment on each charge, consecutively, and a $1,000 fine. The accused appealed.
[2026] SGDC 119 explained
Public Prosecutor v Syed Faizal Bin Syed Abubakar ([2026] SGDC 119) is a Singapore judgment decided by the District Court on 16 April 2026. It is categorised under Criminal Procedure and Sentencing and Section 55A(1)(a)(i) Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act 1992 read with Section 55A(1)(b)(ii). It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGDC 119 about?
Public Prosecutor v Syed Faizal Bin Syed Abubakar ([2026] SGDC 119) is a District Court decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing — Statutory Offences”, “Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing — Statutory Offences — Section 8A(1) Computer Misuse Act 1993”, “Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing — Sentencing Advisory Panel’s Guidelines for Scams-Related Offences”, and “Section 55A(1)(a)(i) Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act 1992 read with Section 55A(1)(b)(ii)”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2026] SGDC 119 consider?
The judgment refers to Computer Misuse Act and Penal Code (Cap 224). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
Summary
The District Court sentenced Syed Faizal Bin Syed Abubakar, aged 45, who pleaded guilty to disclosing his Singpass credentials under section 8A(1) of the Computer Misuse Act 1993 and to a charge under section 55A of the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act 1992 for enabling a person unknown to operate his GXS Bank account. Two further charges were taken into consideration. The court imposed 7 months and 2 weeks' imprisonment on each charge, to run consecutively, and a $1,000 fine, giving a global sentence of 14 months and 4 weeks' imprisonment. The accused appealed.
What was Public Prosecutor v Syed Faizal Bin Syed Abubakar about ([2026] SGDC 119)?
The accused pleaded guilty to disclosing his Singpass credentials and to enabling a person unknown to operate his GXS Bank account, in connection with money laundering. The court sentenced him under the Sentencing Advisory Panel's Guidelines for Scams-Related Offences.
What sentence did the court impose in [2026] SGDC 119?
The court imposed 7 months and 2 weeks' imprisonment for each of the two charges, to run consecutively, and a fine of $1,000 in default 4 days' imprisonment. The global sentence was 14 months and 4 weeks' imprisonment.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (1)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGDC 119)