CRIMSIGN GRAPHICS PTE LTD v AMXON CONSTRUCTORS PTE. LTD.
Key facts
| Court | District Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Samuel Wee |
| Charges / claim | Contract |
| Counsel | BR Law Corporation, Patrick Ong Law LLC, Choa Sn-Yien Brendon, Daniel Tay Yi Ming, Kamini Devi Naidu d/o Devadass, Lim Jia Xin Kimberly |
Source: [2026] SGDC 2, District Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (6)
Case Significance
[2026] SGDC 2 is a District Court decision dated 30 January 2026 concerning Contract, specifically addressing breach. The judgment was delivered by Samuel Wee. The case was brought by Crimsign Graphics Pte Ltd (plaintiff) against Amxon Constructors Pte. Ltd. (defendant). Legal representation was provided by BR Law Corporation and Patrick Ong Law LLC. The judgment references 1 statutory provision, namely the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act.
[2026] SGDC 2 explained
CRIMSIGN GRAPHICS PTE LTD v AMXON CONSTRUCTORS PTE. LTD. ([2026] SGDC 2) is a Singapore judgment decided by the District Court on 30 January 2026. It is categorised under Contract. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGDC 2 about?
CRIMSIGN GRAPHICS PTE LTD v AMXON CONSTRUCTORS PTE. LTD. ([2026] SGDC 2) is a District Court decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Contract — Breach — Whether sub-contractor breached its contractual obligations by failing to perform the scope of work required”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2026] SGDC 2 consider?
The judgment refers to Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act (Cap 30B). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
Summary
A signage subcontractor sued a construction main contractor for $159,695.66 in unpaid balances under three MRT station signage contracts, while the contractor counterclaimed for defective works. The court allowed the claim, awarding $158,855.16 after deducting $840.50 for proven mega signage defects, finding the defendant's endorsement of final account documents precluded most of its defect claims.
What was decided in [2026] SGDC 2?
[2026] SGDC 2 (CRIMSIGN GRAPHICS PTE LTD v AMXON CONSTRUCTORS PTE. LTD.) is a District Court decision from 30 January 2026 addressing Contract, specifically breach. The judgment was delivered by Samuel Wee.
Who were the parties in CRIMSIGN GRAPHICS PTE LTD v AMXON CONSTRUCTORS PTE. LTD. ([2026] SGDC 2)?
The plaintiff in [2026] SGDC 2 was Crimsign Graphics Pte Ltd, and the defendant was Amxon Constructors Pte. Ltd.. Legal representation included Patrick Ong Law LLC and BR Law Corporation. The case was decided on 30 January 2026 in the District Court.
Which judge decided [2026] SGDC 2?
[2026] SGDC 2 was delivered by Samuel Wee in the District Court on 30 January 2026. The case concerned Contract.
Statutes Cited
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGDC 2)