Singapore Case Law Database

The Appellate Division dismissed the application, with the result that the appeal was deemed withdrawn.

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeals in part.

The High Court dismissed Lin's claims over both the flat and the Golden Mile proceeds and dismissed Ho's counterclaim, finding instead that Hor and Ho hold the flat on resulting trust for Mr Kua's…

The court declared that it had jurisdiction and entered judgment for Roll.

Steven Chong JCA dismissed the criminal motion without setting it down for hearing.

The court ordered that the enforcement of the plaintiff's undertaking as to damages be held over until the Estonian proceedings between the plaintiff and the first defendant were resolved.

See Kee Oon J dismissed the appeal and affirmed the sentence of two weeks' imprisonment.

The court allowed the claimants' claim in part, making orders in terms of prayers one, two, three (with qualifications), four and seven.

The court dismissed the Husband's application to set aside the AM Order and ordered costs of $2,000 inclusive of disbursements.

The High Court allowed the claim in part.

The court allowed the appeal and substituted an order for probation in lieu of detention, with probation for 24 months from the date of the order.

The High Court granted the declarations sought in OA 218 that the Requisitionists were not members under s 176(1) and that the requisition notice was invalid.

Lai Siu Chiu SJ dismissed the plaintiff's claim.

The court dismissed both summonses.

The court allowed Calpeda's claim for $683,147.92 with interest at 5.33% per annum from service of the writ to judgment, and dismissed Chew Construction's counterclaim in full.

Philip Jeyaretnam J dismissed CYY's application and held that the tribunal had jurisdiction over the disputed claims.

Aedit Abdullah J allowed the sealing applications and granted the moratoria extensions in part, for about three months rather than the six months sought, so that the court could keep the matter under…

The High Court dismissed the Specific Defendants' application for bifurcation, holding that splitting the trial would not be just and convenient.

Lee Seiu Kin J allowed Towa's damages claims in part.

The court dismissed both applications and ordered the plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs fixed at $5000, inclusive of disbursements.

The court dismissed all of Sandra's claims, including those she had earlier withdrawn, and awarded the defendants costs to be assessed if not agreed.

The court found the elements of the trafficking charge established against both Low and Sivaprakash and convicted them.

The Appellate Division dismissed the appeal with costs in an ex tempore judgment, finding that the landlord could not use the indemnity clause to recover the fire losses.

The Court of Appeal dismissed both appeals.

Sundaresh Menon CJ dismissed the appeal, holding that the district judge had struck the balance correctly in granting a DNATA.