Singapore Case Law Database

The Appellate Division allowed the appeal and set aside the Judge's decision in its entirety, so OS 1215 would proceed in Singapore.

Sundaresh Menon CJ found the applicant not suitable for admission at that time and granted him leave to withdraw the application.

The court allowed both stay applications under O 45 r 11, so the discovery orders in SUM 462 and SUM 463 were stayed pending the applications for permission to appeal.

Lee Seiu Kin J allowed the claim in part.

The court allowed the application on 15 March 2023 and placed the company under judicial management, holding that the company was likely to become unable to pay its debts and that a judicial…

The High Court allowed the application in part.

Goh Yihan JC found the caveat had not been lodged vexatiously, frivolously or not in good faith and was justified, but allowed the alternative prayer.

Aedit Abdullah J dismissed both appeals against conviction on all charges and Mr De Costa's appeal against sentence on the Computer Misuse Act charge.

The High Court dismissed the appeal.

The High Court allowed BH's application.

See Kee Oon J allowed the Prosecution's appeal, holding that the $4,000 fine for careless driving was manifestly inadequate.

S Mohan J found no contributory negligence by Mr Doney and held the driver 100% liable, with the employer vicariously liable.

By a majority (Belinda Ang Saw Ean JCA and Aedit Abdullah J), the Appellate Division dismissed the appeal and ordered Chubb to pay costs of $80,000 (all in) to Sizer.

The court rejected the Official Assignee's objection that the summons was late, but held that the creditor had not shown good reasons to vary the determination.

The High Court dismissed the originating application and affirmed the defendant's absolute ownership of the flat.

The Assistant Registrar dismissed the striking out application in its entirety, finding that the Defendants had not established any of the grounds for striking out.

The court dismissed all four applications.

The court allowed both of the plaintiffs' claims and dismissed the directors' fees and services remuneration counterclaims, but allowed the counterclaim for injunctions, so the defendants succeeded…

Goh Yihan JC allowed the plaintiffs' appeal.

The Appellate Division allowed the wife's appeal in part.

The Appellate Division (Woo Bih Li JAD delivering the judgment, with Belinda Ang Saw Ean JCA and Hoo Sheau Peng J) dismissed the application to adduce further evidence but allowed the appeal, setting…

The Court of Appeal dismissed Mr Sanjay's criminal motion and both appeals against conviction and sentence.

The court rejected Mr Ravi's request and dismissed the further points he raised.

Goh Yihan JC dismissed all three summonses, SUM 29, SUM 30 and SUM 156, and directed the parties to seek directions from the Registry on the hearing of the substantive appeals.

The Assistant Registrar allowed the application and converted Originating Application No 7 of 2023 into an originating claim.