Confidence
3 cases · January 2025 to December 2025
Overview
Confidence appeared in 3 reported judgments in Singapore between January 2025 to December 2025. Key sub-topics included Breach of confidence — Wrongful loss and wrongful gain interests — Whether proof that information was not used is sufficient to defeat wrongful loss claim (1) and Breach of confidence (1). The most active judge was Kannan Ramesh (1 case), and the leading firm was Wong & Leow LLC (2 cases).
Data coverage: between January 2025 to December 2025
Which law firms handle the most Confidence cases in Singapore?
Wong & Leow LLC leads in confidence with 2 cases between January 2025 to December 2025, followed by Mallal & Namazie (2 cases) and UniLegal LLC (1 case). 5 firms appeared in confidence cases during this period.
Who are the leading Confidence lawyers in Singapore?
Namazie Mirza Mohamed is the most active confidence lawyer in Singapore with 2 case appearances between January 2025 to December 2025, followed by Chua Boon Beng (2) and Ang Hsueh Ling Celeste (2). 14 lawyers appeared in confidence cases during this period.
Which judges handle the most Confidence cases in Singapore?
Kannan Ramesh has handled 1 case in confidence between January 2025 to December 2025, the most of any Singapore judge. See Kee Oon (1 case) and Woo Bih Li (1 case) are also among the most active. 5 judges heard confidence cases.
How many confidence cases are heard in Singapore courts?
Between January 2025 to December 2025, 3 reported judgments involved confidence in Singapore courts. The majority were heard in the High Court (General Division) (2 cases).
What are the main sub-topics in Singapore confidence cases?
The main sub-topics in Singapore confidence litigation between January 2025 to December 2025 were Breach of confidence — Wrongful loss and wrongful gain interests — Whether proof that information was not used is sufficient to defeat wrongful loss claim (1 case), Breach of confidence (1 case), Breach of confidence — Locus standi to sue for person under one’s responsibility (1 case).