Leading Res Judicata Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

20 reported cases · January 2023 to May 2026

Updated

What did Singapore courts decide in Res Judicata?

Singapore courts issued 20 reported Res Judicata judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (8), of the 10 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Appeal dismissed (7), the median monetary award recorded was $9,000. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.

Reported cases 20 (2023–2026)
By year 2026 (3) · 2025 (5) · 2024 (4) · 2023 (8)
By court SGHC (8) · SGCA (3) · SGHC(I) (3) · SGCA(I) (2) · SGHC(A) (2) · SGFC (1) · SGHCR (1)
Outcomes (10 parseable) Appeal dismissed (7) · Application dismissed (2) · Appeal allowed (1)
Median monetary award $9,000 (across 1 award)
Most active counsel Chew Kei-Jin (2) · Lee Chia Ming (2) · Abiramee Ghandhidass (1) · Alexander Lawrence Yeo Han Tiong (1) · Axl Rizqy (1)

Compiled from 20 reported Res Judicata judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.

Outcome data updated

Across 20 reported Res Judicata judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to May 2026), WongPartnership LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (5 cases), Axl Rizqy is the most active lawyer (3 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.

Overview

Res Judicata appears in 20 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Issue estoppel (11), Extended doctrine of res judicata (10) and Applicable principles (3). The most active judge by reported case count is Judith Prakash (5 cases) and the most active firm is WongPartnership LLP (5 cases).

Which law firms handle the most Res Judicata cases in Singapore?

WongPartnership LLP leads in Res Judicata with 5 cases between January 2023 and May 2026, followed by Allen & Gledhill LLP (4 cases) and Drew & Napier LLC (4 cases). 29 firms appeared in Res Judicata cases during this period.

Who are the leading Res Judicata lawyers in Singapore?

Axl Rizqy is the most active Res Judicata lawyer in Singapore with 3 case appearances between January 2023 and May 2026, followed by Chew Kei-Jin (2) and Lee Chia Ming (2).

Which judges handle the most Res Judicata cases in Singapore?

Judith Prakash has handled 5 Res Judicata cases between January 2023 and May 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Andre Maniam (4 cases) and Sundaresh Menon (3 cases) are also among the most active.

How many Res Judicata cases are reported in Singapore courts?

20 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Res Judicata, most often decided by Judith Prakash.

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Res Judicata cases?

The main sub-topics are Issue estoppel (11), Extended doctrine of res judicata (10) and Applicable principles (3).

Case Volume by Year

8
23
4
24
5
25
3
26
2023–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Extended doctrine of res judicata — Applicability of extended doctrine of res judicata to the issuance of multiple maintenance orders 1 case

Extended doctrine of res judicata — Whether appropriate to consider in applications preceding proceedings that ought to be precluded by res judicata 1 case

Applicable principles — Creditor seeking a stay of the appeal in Singapore — Whether res judicata arose in the decision of a liquidator of a foreign company which was pending an appeal in another jurisdiction 1 case

Extended doctrine of res judicata — Shortcomings in a party’s conduct during the interlocutory stages of a previous suit do not amount to “special circumstances” justifying a waiver of res judicata 1 case

Key Statutes

cited in 6 cases
cited in 5 cases
cited in 5 cases
cited in 5 cases
cited in 3 cases
Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 3 cases
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 3 cases
State Immunity Act
cited in 3 cases
cited in 2 cases
cited in 2 cases
Malaysian Courts of Judicature Act
cited in 1 case
UK Act
cited in 1 case
cited in 1 case
cited in 1 case

Court Distribution

Cases

[2026] SGHC 112
Djony Gunawan v Christina Lesmana
22 May 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGFC 58
YCD v YCE
23 April 2026
SGFC
[2026] SGHC 42
REN XINWU v HOMING HOLDINGS PTE. LTD. (in liquidation) & Anor
23 February 2026
SGHC
[2025] SGHC(I) 19
HULLEY ENTERPRISES LIMITED & 2 Ors v THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
25 July 2025
SGHC(I)
[2025] SGHC 139
DLS v DLT
24 July 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHCR 20
GOH HUI EN REBECCA v IG ASIA PTE. LTD.
1 July 2025
SGHCR
[2025] SGHC(I) 12
DMF v DMG
17 April 2025
SGHC(I)
[2025] SGCA 10
CIX v DGN
13 March 2025
SGCA
[2024] SGCA 54
LIM OON KUIN & 2 Ors v Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP
25 November 2024
SGCA
[2024] SGHC(A) 31
ARI INVESTMENT LIMITED & Anor v ACCELERA PRECIOUS TIMBER AND STRATEGIC AGRICULTURE LIMITED & 2 Ors
8 October 2024
SGHC(A)
[2024] SGHC 133
CIX v DGN
24 May 2024
SGHC
[2024] SGCA 7
KYEN RESOURCES PTE. LTD (IN COMPULSORY LIQUIDATION) & 2 Ors v FEIMA INTERNATIONAL (HONGKONG) LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)
5 March 2024
SGCA
[2023] SGCA(I) 10
THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA v DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
15 December 2023
SGCA(I)
[2023] SGHC(A) 37
GROUP LEASE HOLDINGS PTE LTD & Anor v JTRUST ASIA PTE LTD
22 November 2023
SGHC(A)
[2023] SGHC 303
VALUE MONETIZATION III LTD v LIM BENG CHOO
27 October 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 295
ARI INVESTMENT LIMITED & Anor v ACCELERA PRECIOUS TIMBER AND STRATEGIC AGRICULTURE LIMITED & 3 Ors
17 October 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 262
SABYASACHI MUKHERJEE & Anor v PRADEEPTO KUMAR BISWAS
15 September 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 167
JTRUST ASIA PTE LTD v GROUP LEASE HOLDINGS PTE LTD & 5 Ors
16 June 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGCA(I) 3
KIRI INDUSTRIES LIMITED v DYSTAR GLOBAL HOLDINGS (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
14 April 2023
SGCA(I)
[2023] SGHC(I) 7
CNX v CNY
30 January 2023
SGHC(I)

Methodology & disclaimer

Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.