H

Heershan Kaur

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Heershan Kaur. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Heershan Kaur appears as counsel of record in 6 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the SGCA.

These cases span several subject areas, most often Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure and Sentencing, and Heershan Kaur acted for the respondent in 4 and the plaintiff in 1.

Reported cases
6
Courts
SGCA, SGDC, SGHC
Period
June 2023 to May 2026

Source: derived from 6 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Heershan Kaur — Reported Cases & Litigation Record

How Heershan Kaur appeared

Counsel for the respondent
4 cases
Counsel for the plaintiff
1 case
Counsel for the prosecution
1 case

Recorded outcomes

Appeal dismissed
2
Sentence imposed
1

Disposition recorded in 3 of 6 cases.

What the courts decided

[2026] SGCA 17 Appeal dismissed

“…we dismissed the appeal in CCA 5 as well.”

AFFANDI BIN MOHAMED HASSAN v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR · SGCA · · Counsel for the respondent
[2024] SGCA 6 Appeal dismissed

“…we dismissed the appeal against conviction and sentence.”

Shen Hanjie v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR · SGCA · · Counsel for the respondent
[2023] SGHC 182 Sentence imposed

“I sentenced the accused to the mandatory death penalty.”

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v AFFANDI BIN MOHAMED HASSAN · SGHC · · Counsel for the prosecution

Parties in these cases

Affandi bin Mohamed Hassan2 Pattappan Moovendran1 Muhammad Hamir B Laka1 Shen Hanjie1 Ramdhan bin Lajis1

What areas of law does Heershan Kaur practice?

Criminal Law 4 cases

Reported between June 2023 and April 2026.

Criminal Procedure and Sentencing 2 cases

Reported between April 2026 and May 2026.

6
Appearances
3
Roles
1
Firm
No
Senior Counsel

Counsel for the plaintiff (1)

Counsel for the respondent (4)

Counsel for the prosecution (1)

Rankings

Most active lawyers by reported court cases →