P

Phua Cheng Sye Charles

PKWA Law Practice LLC · 2024–2026 Called to the Bar in 1995 4 appearances

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Phua Cheng Sye Charles. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Phua Cheng Sye Charles appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Singapore judgments (2024–2026), most often before the SGMC.

These cases span several subject areas, most often Tort, Damages and Civil Procedure, and Phua Cheng Sye Charles acted for the defendant in 3 and the respondent in 1.

Reported cases
4
Courts
SGMC, SGDC, SGHC
Period
February 2024 to April 2026

Source: derived from 4 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Phua Cheng Sye Charles — Reported Cases & Litigation Record

How Phua Cheng Sye Charles appeared

Counsel for the defendant
3 cases
Counsel for the respondent
1 case

Recorded outcomes

Claim allowed in part
1
Appeal allowed
1

Disposition recorded in 2 of 4 cases.

What the courts decided

[2026] SGMC 3 Claim allowed in part

“For the foregoing reasons, I award general damages in the global sum of $9,800 and special damages in the global sum of $3353.71 with the usual consequential orders.”

WEN HANRONG v HUATIONG CONTRACTOR PTE LTD & Anor · SGMC · · Counsel for the defendant
[2024] SGHC 36 Appeal allowed

“I allow the appeal.”

NAGARAJAN MURUGESAN v GRAND RICH ELECTRICAL & ENGINEERING PTE. LTD. & 2 Ors · SGHC · · Counsel for the respondent

Parties in these cases

Anbalagan Murugan2 Huationg Contractor Pte Ltd2 Wen Hanrong2 Eng Lee Engineering Pte Ltd1 Yuan Ji Enterprises Pte Ltd1 Grand Rich Electrical & Engineering Pte Ltd1 Nagarajan Murugesan1 Wne One Enterprise LLP1

What areas of law does Phua Cheng Sye Charles practice?

4
Appearances
1995
Year of Call
1
Firm
No
Senior Counsel

Counsel for the defendant (3)

Counsel for the respondent (1)

Rankings

Most active lawyers by reported court cases →