CFJ & Anor v CFL & Anor
Outcome
Application dismissedwe dismiss the Applications in their entirety.
Source: [2023] SGHC(I) 1, Singapore International Commercial Court, decided 31 January 2023. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | Singapore International Commercial Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judges | Arjan Kumar Sikri, Dominique Hascher, Kannan Ramesh |
| Charges / claim | Arbitration |
| Outcome | Application dismissed |
| Counsel | Colin Liew LLC, Davinder Singh Chambers LLC, Duxton Hill Chambers (Singapore Group Practice), Essex Court Chambers Duxton (Singapore Group Practice), WongPartnership LLP, Chan Hock Keng, Davinder Singh, Fong Cheng Yee David, Ho Yi Jie, Jill Ann Koh Ying, Liang Fang Ling Elisabeth, Liew Wey-ren Colin, Lin Xianyang Timothy, Low Sze Hui Jasmine, Tang Xi-Rui, Charlotte, Toby Landau, Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin |
Source: [2023] SGHC(I) 1, Singapore International Commercial Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Counsel (17)
Parties (4)
Case Significance
CFJ and another v CFL and another and other matters [2023] SGHC(I) 1 was decided in the Singapore International Commercial Court by Kannan Ramesh JAD (delivering the judgment), Dominique Hascher IJ and Arjan Kumar Sikri IJ, with judgment reserved and given on 31 January 2023. The proceedings comprised Originating Summonses Nos 7 and 8 of 2020 and Originating Summons No 9 of 2021, arising from a long-running arbitration between two substantial energy groups over a dispute regarding the sale of shares in a member of one group to members of the other. The applications raised how strictly an arbitral tribunal must adhere to the parties' pleadings or memorials, when the fair hearing rule is not satisfied, and when there is apparent bias in an arbitrator; one party alleged the tribunal failed to follow the pleaded case and questioned the impartiality of its President. The catchwords concern recourse against an arbitral award and setting aside.
[2023] SGHC(I) 1 explained
CFJ & Anor v CFL & Anor ([2023] SGHC(I) 1) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Singapore International Commercial Court on 31 January 2023. It is categorised under Arbitration. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2023] SGHC(I) 1 about?
CFJ & Anor v CFL & Anor ([2023] SGHC(I) 1) is a Singapore International Commercial Court decision from 2023. Its published catchwords are “Arbitration — Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2023] SGHC(I) 1 consider?
The judgment refers to Arbitration Act (Cap 10), English Arbitration Act (Cap 10), International Arbitration Act (Cap 143A), and International Arbitration Act (Cap 10). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
How influential is [2023] SGHC(I) 1?
Within this corpus, [2023] SGHC(I) 1 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
What issues did CFJ v CFL [2023] SGHC(I) 1 address?
The Singapore International Commercial Court considered how strictly an arbitral tribunal must adhere to the parties' pleadings, when the fair hearing rule is not satisfied, and when there is apparent bias in an arbitrator, in applications to set aside an award.
Who heard CFJ and another v CFL and another in the SICC ([2023] SGHC(I) 1)?
The Singapore International Commercial Court comprised Kannan Ramesh JAD, who delivered the judgment, with Dominique Hascher IJ and Arjan Kumar Sikri IJ. Judgment was reserved and given on 31 January 2023 across Originating Summonses Nos 7 and 8 of 2020 and No 9 of 2021.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (21)
Cited By (1)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2023] SGHC(I) 1)