NGUYEN THUY HA v TRAN THI BICH HA
Outcome
Application granted“The application was granted by the learned deputy registrar on 18 December 2024. 4 Foot Note 4 × 16NTH at [9]-[12].”
Source: [2026] SGDC 241, District Court, decided 23 July 2026. Read directly from the judgment.
Featured in the weekly digest — week of 20–26 July 2026 →
Key facts
| Court | District Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Chiah Kok Khun |
| Charges / claim | Contempt of Court |
| Outcome | Application granted |
| Counsel | Hong Lianghao, Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP, TSMP Law Corporation, Ang Leong Hao, Mark Tang Yu Zhong, Phoon Wuei, Wong Soon Peng Adrian |
Source: [2026] SGDC 241, District Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (7)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
Nguyen Thuy Ha v Tran Thi Bich Ha [2026] SGDC 241 was decided by District Judge Chiah Kok Khun in the District Court on 23 July 2026 (District Court Suit No 1448 of 2021, District Court Summons No 258 of 2026). In an underlying defamation suit, the plaintiff disclosed WhatsApp correspondence under a discovery order, and the defendant later posted it on her SafeChat and Facebook pages from 24 October 2025 to 11 December 2025. The issues were whether this breached the Riddick principle, whether the breach was intentional and amounted to contempt under s 4(1) of the Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016, and whether imprisonment was appropriate. The court found contempt, held a custodial sentence was not called for, and imposed a fine of $3,000.
[2026] SGDC 241 explained
NGUYEN THUY HA v TRAN THI BICH HA ([2026] SGDC 241) is a Singapore judgment decided by the District Court on 23 July 2026. It is categorised under Contempt of Court. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGDC 241 about?
NGUYEN THUY HA v TRAN THI BICH HA ([2026] SGDC 241) is a District Court decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Contempt of Court – Civil contempt – Plaintiff disclosing documents in course of defamation suit – Defendant posting documents on SafeChat and Facebook before trial – Whether breach of Riddick principle – Whether contempt of court – Whether breach intentional – Whether motive relevant – Whether custodial sentence appropriate – Section 4(1) Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2026] SGDC 241 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2026] SGMC 67, [2026] SGDC 113, and [2026] SGDC 84, and 1 more. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
Summary
The District Court heard the plaintiff's application to commit the defendant for contempt of court. In an earlier defamation suit, the defendant posted WhatsApp correspondence disclosed to her by the plaintiff on her SafeChat and Facebook pages between 24 October 2025 and 11 December 2025, before the trial. The court found a breach of the Riddick undertaking amounting to contempt, but found prejudice limited and the posts removed, held that a custodial sentence was not called for, imposed a fine of $3,000, and ordered the defendant to pay costs.
What sentence was imposed in Nguyen Thuy Ha v Tran Thi Bich Ha [2026] SGDC 241?
District Judge Chiah Kok Khun found the defendant in contempt for breaching her Riddick undertaking and imposed a fine of $3,000, holding a custodial sentence was not called for because prejudice was limited and the posts were removed.
What was the Riddick breach in [2026] SGDC 241?
The defendant posted WhatsApp correspondence disclosed by the plaintiff in a defamation suit on her SafeChat and Facebook pages between 24 October 2025 and 11 December 2025, before the trial, in breach of the implied undertaking against collateral use.
Cases Cited (18)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGDC 241)