DNZ v DOA & Anor
[2026] SGHC(I) 1 Singapore International Commercial Court 9 January 2026 • SIC/OA 2/2025 • 103 min read
17 cases cited
(14 SG, 3 foreign)
Cited by 1 case
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Counsel (14)
Providence Law Asia LLC Firm WongPartnership LLP Firm Dan Sarooshi Counsel Defendant Daniel Gaw Wai Ming Counsel Claimant Koh Swee Yen Counsel Claimant Liew Wey-ren Colin Counsel Defendant Marc Daniel Veit Counsel Defendant Ngo Wei Shing Counsel Defendant Rajiv Hariharan Counsel Defendant Robert Bradshaw Counsel Defendant Soh Kheng Yau Andre Counsel Claimant Steffen Hindelang Counsel Claimant Teo Wei Kiat Samuel Counsel Claimant Wu Danqiong Danielle Counsel Claimant
Parties (3)
Summary
An EU Member State applied to set aside a Final Award of approximately €52 million issued under the Energy Charter Treaty, arguing the tribunal lacked jurisdiction and that a breach of natural justice occurred in the quantum assessment. The Singapore International Commercial Court dismissed the application on all grounds, finding the tribunal had jurisdiction over the UK investors' claims and that the State had adequate opportunity to present its case on quantum.
Statutes Cited
Arbitration Act (Cap 10)
International Arbitration Act (Cap 143A)
Cases Cited (17)
SG (1)
SLR (13)
[2007] 1 SLR(R) 597 [2007] 3 SLR(R) 86 [2010] 3 SLR 1 [2016] 4 SLR 768 [2016] 5 SLR 536 [2019] 1 SLR 263 [2020] 5 SLR 184 [2021] 3 SLR 22 [2021] 5 SLR 405 [2022] 4 SLR 218 [2023] 1 SLR 349 [2024] 5 SLR 706 [2025] 3 SLR 209
UK (2)
[2019] EWHC 3580 [2023] EWHC 1226
AU (1)
[2025] FCA 1028
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGHC(I) 1)