Singapore Case Law Database

S Mohan J found that the works were defective and that Hanjin breached the sub-contract, but held that no tortious duty of care arose and that the Side Letter precluded the claim.

The court sentenced the accused to 10 years' imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane for culpable homicide, three years' imprisonment for the child abuse charge, 2½ years' imprisonment and three…

The court ordered the defendant to pay US$742.73m in compensation to a trust fund, with post-judgment interest at 5.33% a year from 26 May 2023, and declared that it had breached its duty as at 30…

The Appellate Division (Woo Bih Li JAD, Debbie Ong Siew Ling JAD and Valerie Thean J), in an ex tempore judgment, granted Summons No 32 of 2023 and dismissed the appeal.

The High Court found that the accused had rebutted the presumption only for three exhibits, containing 58.64 grams of methamphetamine, which were for his own consumption.

The court ordered that the matrimonial home and the four overseas properties be sold by 31 March 2024, with net proceeds and interim rental income shared 77.5% to the husband and 22.5% to the wife;…

The court dismissed the application to continue OA 152 and stay the other matters, dismissed the fresh evidence application, and dismissed the three registrar's appeals against the refusal of a stay,…

The court ordered the matrimonial assets to be divided 52:48 between the husband and the wife, giving her $5,549,371.93, after adjusting the contributions ratio for an adverse inference against the…

The High Court dismissed the appeal against sentence and affirmed the sentence of 34 months' imprisonment for the Customs Act offence together with the enhanced sentence of 81 days' imprisonment…

Hri Kumar Nair J allowed AET's application in part.

Hoo Sheau Peng J allowed the claim in part.

In Suit No 520 of 2014 the court allowed Panshore's counterclaim in part, granting interlocutory judgment against Roland for damages to be assessed for breach of the 7 September 2011 agreement and…

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal in an ex tempore judgment and upheld every finding below.

Goh Yihan JC allowed the winding-up application in CWU 87 and dismissed SUM 1741, finding no genuine and serious cross-claim equal to or exceeding the debt.

The High Court dismissed the buyers' claim to recover the forfeited $380,000, holding it validly forfeited as a true deposit.

Hri Kumar Nair J held that forum non conveniens considerations do not apply in deciding whether the court is the appropriate court to hear such an enforcement application, found that it was…

The High Court dismissed the defendant’s application to strike out the claim.

The court dismissed the appeal against conviction but allowed the appeal against sentence, reducing the suspension from nine months to three months.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal against conviction and affirmed the trial judge's decision.

The High Court allowed the Company's application, made the judicial management order and appointed Mr Tam as judicial manager.

The High Court dismissed the appeals against conviction and sentence.

Vincent Hoong J held that the 15-month disqualification order was not manifestly excessive and dismissed the appeal.

Chua Lee Ming J granted the application and made an order under s 204(3) of the IRDA giving the applicants an advantage over the other creditors on the terms of the funding agreement.

The Assistant Registrar allowed SUM 1965 and struck out the claimants' claims against the three defendants in their entirety under O 9 r 16(1)(a) and O 9 r 16(1)(c) of the Rules of Court 2021.

The High Court dismissed OA 130 and OA 184, the applications by BNI and Emirates, and allowed OA 448, the judicial manager's application, granting him an extension of two months from the date of the…