33Club Pte. Ltd. v Design Cliniq Pte. Ltd.

[2026] SGHC 39 High Court (General Division) 20 February 2026 • HC/OC 552/2023 • 100 min read
10 cases cited

Catchwords

Building and Construction Law — Quantum meruit Building and Construction Law — Scope of works Building and Construction Law — Terms — Implied terms Building and Construction Law — Formation and interpretation Building and Construction Law — Damages — Damages for defects Building and Construction Law — Construction torts — Negligence Building and Construction Law — Contractors’ duties — Duty as to materials and workmanship Building and Construction Law — Dispute resolution — Alternative dispute resolution procedures

Practice Areas

Building and Construction Law

Judges (1)

Mohamed Faizal Delivered

Counsel (6)

H A & Chung Partnership Firm Shaun Wong LLC Firm Shenton Law Practice LLC Firm Chung Ping Shen Counsel Plaintiff Decruz Martin Francis Counsel Defendant Goh Phai Cheng Counsel Defendant

Parties (2)

33Club Pte Ltd Plaintiff Design Cliniq Pte Ltd Defendant

Case Significance

[2026] SGHC 39 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 20 February 2026 concerning Building and Construction Law, specifically addressing quantum meruit, scope of works, and terms. The judgment was delivered by Mohamed Faizal. The case was brought by 33Club Pte Ltd (plaintiff) against Design Cliniq Pte Ltd (defendant). Legal representation was provided by H A & Chung Partnership and Shaun Wong LLC. The judgment cites 10 cases and references 1 statutory provision, namely the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act.

Summary

33Club Pte Ltd sued Design Cliniq for breach of contract in relation to interior design and renovation works at a commercial premises. The court assessed the scope of defective and incomplete works and the appropriate quantum of damages.

What was decided in [2026] SGHC 39?

[2026] SGHC 39 (33Club Pte. Ltd. v Design Cliniq Pte. Ltd.) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 20 February 2026 addressing Building and Construction Law, specifically quantum meruit, scope of works, and terms. The judgment was delivered by Mohamed Faizal.

Who were the parties in 33Club Pte. Ltd. v Design Cliniq Pte. Ltd.?

The plaintiff in [2026] SGHC 39 was 33Club Pte Ltd, and the defendant was Design Cliniq Pte Ltd. Legal representation included Shaun Wong LLC and H A & Chung Partnership. The case was decided on 20 February 2026 in the High Court (General Division).

Which judge decided [2026] SGHC 39?

[2026] SGHC 39 was delivered by Mohamed Faizal in the High Court (General Division) on 20 February 2026. The case concerned Building and Construction Law.

What cases and statutes does [2026] SGHC 39 cite?

[2026] SGHC 39 cites 10 prior decisions. It references Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act.

Statutes Cited

Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act (Cap 30B)

Cases Cited (10)

SG (2)
[2014] SGHC 177 [2017] SGHC 93
SLR (8)
[2000] 2 SLR(R) 407 [2001] 2 SLR(R) 1 [2007] 2 SLR(R) 983 [2013] 3 SLR 380 [2013] 4 SLR 193 [2016] 4 SLR 728 [2017] 1 SLR 890 [2020] 3 SLR 373

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2026] SGHC 39)