33Club Pte. Ltd. v Design Cliniq Pte. Ltd.
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Mohamed Faizal |
| Charges / claim | Building and Construction Law |
| Counsel | H A & Chung Partnership, Shaun Wong LLC, Shenton Law Practice LLC, Chung Ping Shen, Decruz Martin Francis, Goh Phai Cheng |
Source: [2026] SGHC 39, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (6)
Case Significance
[2026] SGHC 39 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 20 February 2026 concerning Building and Construction Law, specifically addressing quantum meruit, scope of works, and terms. The judgment was delivered by Mohamed Faizal. The case was brought by 33Club Pte Ltd (plaintiff) against Design Cliniq Pte Ltd (defendant). Legal representation was provided by H A & Chung Partnership and Shaun Wong LLC. The judgment cites 10 cases and references 1 statutory provision, namely the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act.
[2026] SGHC 39 explained
33Club Pte. Ltd. v Design Cliniq Pte. Ltd. ([2026] SGHC 39) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 20 February 2026. It is categorised under Building and Construction Law. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGHC 39 about?
33Club Pte. Ltd. v Design Cliniq Pte. Ltd. ([2026] SGHC 39) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Building and Construction Law — Quantum meruit”, “Building and Construction Law — Scope of works”, “Building and Construction Law — Terms — Implied terms”, and “Building and Construction Law — Formation and interpretation”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2026] SGHC 39 consider?
The judgment refers to Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act (Cap 30B). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
Summary
33Club Pte Ltd sued Design Cliniq for breach of contract in relation to interior design and renovation works at a commercial premises. The court assessed the scope of defective and incomplete works and the appropriate quantum of damages.
What was decided in [2026] SGHC 39?
[2026] SGHC 39 (33Club Pte. Ltd. v Design Cliniq Pte. Ltd.) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 20 February 2026 addressing Building and Construction Law, specifically quantum meruit, scope of works, and terms. The judgment was delivered by Mohamed Faizal.
Who were the parties in 33Club Pte. Ltd. v Design Cliniq Pte. Ltd. ([2026] SGHC 39)?
The plaintiff in [2026] SGHC 39 was 33Club Pte Ltd, and the defendant was Design Cliniq Pte Ltd. Legal representation included Shaun Wong LLC and H A & Chung Partnership. The case was decided on 20 February 2026 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2026] SGHC 39?
[2026] SGHC 39 was delivered by Mohamed Faizal in the High Court (General Division) on 20 February 2026. The case concerned Building and Construction Law.
What cases and statutes does [2026] SGHC 39 cite?
[2026] SGHC 39 cites 10 prior decisions. It references Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (10)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGHC 39)