Singapore Case Law Database

The court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the District Judge's order giving care and control of the child to the father, with the existing access arrangements for the mother left in place.

The court dismissed the application summarily under s 394H(7) without setting it down for hearing, finding no legitimate basis to review the concluded appeal in CCA 38.

The High Court dismissed the appeal against conviction and sentence.

Valerie Thean J allowed Tritech's claims in part.

The Court of Appeal (Sundaresh Menon CJ, Judith Prakash JCA and Belinda Ang Saw Ean JCA) dismissed the appeal, holding that it should have been brought to the Appellate Division and was in any event…

S Mohan J dispensed with service and found Dr Chan in contempt for intentionally disobeying paragraphs 1, 9 and 10 of the order personally, and paragraph 2 as sole director of PILS.

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and set aside the Mareva injunction.

The High Court allowed the claim in part: it allowed the claim against Brilliante Singapore for breach of contract and dismissed the claim against Mr Woon.

The High Court dismissed Suit 554, holding that neither a resulting trust nor a common intention constructive trust was proved, and ordered the plaintiffs to pay the defendants' costs, later fixed at…

Lee Seiu Kin J allowed the claim in part.

The court allowed the appeal in part.

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, set aside the judge's declaration, injunction and delivery-up orders, and revoked SG 872 in its entirety under s 80(1)(c) of the Patents Act for insufficiency.

The High Court allowed the appeal and granted summary judgment to JTC for the full sum claimed in prayer 1(b) of HC/SUM 762/2022, without any reduction for Hot Spring's rental relief counterclaim.

The court dismissed both of the plaintiff's applications, with costs fixed at $2,500 for each application.

Dedar Singh Gill J allowed the plaintiff's claim in part.

The court granted the three applications and made the orders sought, giving the trustees liberty to inspect and take copies of the specified bank records held by each of the three banks.

Chua Lee Ming J held that cl 8.3 did not apply, so Lim had standing.

The High Court dismissed the application for an extension of time to appeal, with costs to the respondent fixed at $4,300, inclusive of disbursements.

The court allowed the appeal.

The High Court dismissed the applications for extension of the moratoria under ss 64 and 65 of the IRDA, finding that the applicants had not shown a reasonable prospect of the scheme working.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, so the appellants did not recover their wasted expenditure.

The High Court allowed the claim on behalf of the Company against the Defendant, finding that the Company was entitled to the disputed sum, and ordered the Defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs, to…

The Appellate Division allowed CA 87 in part and allowed CA 88 in part.

Andre Maniam J dismissed CSO's appeal, but limited the parts of the emails CSP could rely on to those relevant to rebutting CSO's two assertions; the rest remained privileged.

On the issue remitted by the Court of Appeal, the court determined the annual tonnage of related products produced by Longsheng to be 56,750 tonnes, and 53,550 tonnes after deducting the 3,200 tonnes…