Singapore Case Law Database

The Appellate Division dismissed both appeals, AD 107 and AD 108, leaving Mr Safie liable to pay Ms Zaiton $205,359.80.

See Kee Oon J dismissed the appeal against both conviction and sentence.

The High Court ordered division of the matrimonial assets in the ratio 60% (Husband):40% (Wife), with Heron Bay to be sold and the net proceeds split in that ratio; the husband to transfer 40% of his…

Choo Han Teck J allowed the appeal and directed that costs here and below be reserved to the trial judge.

The Singapore International Commercial Court dismissed the claimants' application to set aside the Final Award on all four natural justice grounds.

The Appellate Division dismissed both applications to adduce further evidence and dismissed the appeal.

The High Court allowed GTW's appeal and granted a stay of the Singapore proceedings, with costs to be heard later.

The court allowed the appeal, holding that AAI's successful action below could not stand.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the application for leave to review, finding no legitimate basis for reopening the concluded appeal in CCA 36.

The High Court dismissed Mr Thong's action, both in debt and in unjust enrichment, and ordered him to pay the company's costs fixed at $132,300.

The Appellate Division allowed the application and granted D leave to file and serve its notice of appeal within 3 days.

Vincent Hoong J allowed the appeal in part, reducing the caning from three strokes to one.

The High Court dismissed Cheng's claim and allowed Mdm Yong's counterclaim in part.

The court allowed the application.

The Singapore International Commercial Court dismissed all three applications in their entirety.

The Appellate Division allowed the wife's appeal.

The Assistant Registrar allowed the application, struck out both defendants' defences and entered judgment against D1 for USD 63,303,806.66 with interest and costs.

The court dismissed all four applications.

The High Court dismissed the appeal against conviction and sentence, upholding all 53 convictions and the global sentence of 17 months and 8 weeks' imprisonment.

Aedit Abdullah J treated the matter as one for revision, found that serious injustice had been caused, and exercised the court's revisionary powers in Mr Lim's favour, in effect allowing his…

Debbie Ong JAD allowed the appeal in part.

The Appellate Division allowed the appeal in part.

The court allowed the application in part.

The High Court allowed Compass's claim in part.

Chan Seng Onn SJ dismissed the appeal and declined to set aside the registration of the Australian judgment, holding that the court was bound by Liao Eng Kiat v Burswood Nominees Ltd [2004] 4 SLR(R)…