Singapore Case Law Database

The High Court allowed the defendants' appeals in part.

The Court of Appeal (Sundaresh Menon CJ, Tay Yong Kwang JCA and Steven Chong JCA) allowed the appeal in part.

The High Court allowed Mr Mah's claim in part.

The court allowed Bay's claim in part.

Mavis Chionh Sze Chyi J dismissed the Plaintiff's claim against both Defendants.

The court convicted the accused on both the rape charge and the house-breaking charge.

Chua Lee Ming J allowed the appeal in part and dismissed it in part, ordering disclosure in line with his interpretation of ss 124(1) and 133 of the Evidence Act.

The court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the district judge's orders, save that child maintenance was increased to $1,144 a month with the husband's consent.

Choo Han Teck J allowed the appeal and rescinded the variation orders made in FC/SUM 380/2021, so the Wife no longer had to pay the S$1,500 monthly contribution.

The High Court dismissed the appeal against sentence.

The Appellate Division allowed the appeal in part.

The Court of Appeal (Judith Prakash JCA, Tay Yong Kwang JCA and Woo Bih Li JAD) allowed the prosecution's appeal, set aside the acquittal and convicted BWJ of aggravated rape.

S Mohan J allowed the main contractor's appeal, reversed the Assistant Registrar's decision and stayed the court action in favour of arbitration under s 6 of the Arbitration Act 2001.

The court allowed the application, finding due cause for sanction under s 83(1) of the Legal Profession Act 1966.

Vinodh Coomaraswamy J held that Ms Phey holds all the shares on a presumed resulting trust for Mr Salem alone and dismissed Mr Nagaraja's claim.

The court allowed the claim in part and dismissed the counterclaim.

The court allowed Sunrise's claim in part.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and maintained the anti-suit injunction in the terms ordered by the Judge, awarding Westbridge costs of $100,000 all in.

The High Court allowed DDW's application, deciding that its claim to the balance sale proceeds had priority over the other interveners and ordering the balance to be paid out to DDW's solicitors.

The Appellate Division (Woo Bih Li JAD and Debbie Ong Siew Ling JAD) allowed the appeal in part: it allowed the appeal of JS Energy, Straits Grid and Rodeo Power, set aside the declaration that…

The court allowed the developer's claim in part, reducing one head, assessing damages at $720,960.84 with interest at 5.33% from the date of the originating summons to judgment.