Leading Abuse of Process Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

24 reported cases · August 2023 to September 2026

Updated

What did Singapore courts decide in Abuse of Process?

Singapore courts issued 24 reported Abuse of Process judgments (2023–2026), most in the High Court (10), of the 6 whose outcome could be read from the judgment, the most common was Appeal dismissed (3). This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.

Reported cases 24 (2023–2026)
By year 2026 (7) · 2025 (9) · 2024 (5) · 2023 (3)
By court High Court (10) · Court of Appeal (7) · High Court Registrar (5) · High Court (Appellate Division) (1) · Singapore International Commercial Court (1)
Outcomes (6 judgments) Appeal dismissed (3) · Appeal allowed (1) · Application dismissed (1) · Application granted (1)

Compiled from 24 reported Abuse of Process judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.

Outcome data updated

Across 24 reported Abuse of Process judgments in Singapore courts (August 2023 to September 2026), Suresh s/o Damodara is the most active lawyer (3 case appearances). The lists below count how often named firms and lawyers appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.

Overview

Abuse of Process appears in 24 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Henderson v Henderson doctrine (9), Collateral purpose (6) and Riddick principle (3). The most active judge by reported case count is Steven Chong (4 cases).

Which law firms handle the most Abuse of Process cases in Singapore?

Attorney-General's Chambers (4 cases), WongPartnership LLP (4 cases) and TSMP Law Corporation (3 cases) appear as a firm on record in reported Abuse of Process cases between August 2023 and September 2026. 38 firms appeared in Abuse of Process cases during this period.

Who are the leading Abuse of Process lawyers in Singapore?

Suresh s/o Damodara is the most active Abuse of Process lawyer in Singapore with 3 case appearances between August 2023 and September 2026.

Which judges handle the most Abuse of Process cases in Singapore?

Steven Chong has handled 4 Abuse of Process cases between August 2023 and September 2026, the most of any Singapore judge.

How many Abuse of Process cases are reported in Singapore courts?

24 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Abuse of Process, most often decided by Steven Chong.

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Abuse of Process cases?

The main sub-topics are Henderson v Henderson doctrine (9), Collateral purpose (6) and Riddick principle (3).

Case Volume by Year

3
23
5
24
9
25
7
26
2023–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Henderson v Henderson doctrine 9 cases

  • The Appellate Division (Debbie Ong Siew Ling JAD and See Kee Oon JAD) dismissed both appeals, finding the Judge's decision was not plainly wrong or against the weight of the evidence.

    High Court (Appellate Division) · 16 April 2026 · [2026] SGHC(A) 10
  • The Assistant Registrar dismissed the striking-out application, allowing OA 979 to proceed, and ordered that Mr Gunawan, though self-represented, be paid $2,000 (all in) in costs for resisting it.

    High Court Registrar · 23 February 2026 · [2026] SGHCR 4
  • The High Court dismissed the defendants' application in HC/SUM 1733/2025, leaving ORC 619 in place, and allowed LLS's application in HC/SUM 2095/2025, ordering that the interim injunction in ORC 3351…

    High Court · 30 September 2025 · [2025] SGHC 194
  • Assistant Registrar Wee Yen Jean dismissed IGA's application and declined to strike out any of Ms Goh's claims.

    High Court Registrar · 1 July 2025 · [2025] SGHCR 20
  • The court dismissed both OA 26 and OA 27, holding DMF a party to the charterparty and bound by the arbitration clause, and leaving illegality and public policy to the tribunal.

    Singapore International Commercial Court · 17 April 2025 · [2025] SGHC(I) 12
  • + 4 more cases

Collateral purpose 6 cases

  • The High Court dismissed the defendants' application in HC/SUM 2385/2026 in its entirety and allowed the claimants' application in HC/SUM 2549/2026, ordering the third and fourth defendants to take…

    High Court · 25 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC 197
  • The Court of Appeal (Tay Yong Kwang JCA delivering the grounds, with Steven Chong JCA and Ang Cheng Hock JCA) heard both matters on 6 March 2026 and dismissed the criminal motion and the appeal…

    Court of Appeal · 14 April 2026 · [2026] SGCA 17
  • The court set aside the freezing order ORC 5600 and allowed SUM 2992, the defendant's setting-aside application.

    High Court · 21 January 2026 · [2026] SGHC 16
  • The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal against conviction and sentence and dismissed both criminal motions on 27 February 2025, upholding 13 years' imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane.

    Court of Appeal · 25 April 2025 · [2025] SGCA 18
  • The Court of Appeal dismissed Criminal Motion No 47 of 2024 in its entirety as an abuse of process.

    Court of Appeal · 7 March 2025 · [2025] SGCA 9
  • + 1 more case

Riddick principle 3 cases

Inconsistent positions 2 cases

  • The court dismissed both OA 26 and OA 27, holding DMF a party to the charterparty and bound by the arbitration clause, and leaving illegality and public policy to the tribunal.

    Singapore International Commercial Court · 17 April 2025 · [2025] SGHC(I) 12
  • Philip Jeyaretnam J allowed the claim in OC 301.

    High Court · 19 January 2024 · [2024] SGHC 13

Collateral purpose — Appellant seeking retrial under guise of application to adduce fresh evidence 1 case

  • The Court of Appeal dismissed the criminal motion to adduce further evidence and dismissed the appeal against conviction and sentence.

    Court of Appeal · 24 March 2026 · [2026] SGCA 15

Inconsistent positions — Appellant seeking to adduce fresh evidence that he elected not to adduce at trial 1 case

  • The Court of Appeal dismissed the criminal motion to adduce further evidence and dismissed the appeal against conviction and sentence.

    Court of Appeal · 24 March 2026 · [2026] SGCA 15

Riddick principle — Cogency of the evidence 1 case

  • The court allowed Mr Woo's discovery application in part, granting most categories on amended terms; dismissed SEG's unless order application; and allowed SEG's release application in part,…

    High Court Registrar · 23 May 2025 · [2025] SGHCR 14

Riddick principle — Whether leave should be granted to lift the Riddick undertaking 1 case

  • The High Court allowed the plaintiffs' application, but only for the sole purpose of letting the Hong Kong court decide whether the defendant had breached its discovery order.

    High Court · 25 April 2024 · [2024] SGHC 106

Riddick principle — Whether proceedings for the enforcement of judgment debt were brought for a collateral purpose 1 case

Inconsistent positions — Non approbation and reprobation 1 case

Key Statutes

cited in 6 cases
cited in 4 cases
cited in 3 cases
cited in 3 cases
cited in 3 cases
cited in 3 cases
Penal Code (Cap 224)
cited in 2 cases
cited in 2 cases
cited in 2 cases
cited in 2 cases
Business Names Registration Act
cited in 1 case
Partnership Act
cited in 1 case
Malaysian Courts of Judicature Act
cited in 1 case
UK Act
cited in 1 case
cited in 1 case

Court Distribution

Cases

Methodology & disclaimer

Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Singapore court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.