Courts and Jurisdiction
8 cases · January 2025 to January 2026
Overview
Courts and Jurisdiction appeared in 8 reported judgments in Singapore between January 2025 to January 2026. Key sub-topics included Jurisdiction (2) and Vexatious litigants (1). The most active judge was See Kee Oon (2 cases), and the leading firm was RHTLaw Asia LLP (1 case).
Data coverage: between January 2025 to January 2026
Which law firms handle the most Courts and Jurisdiction cases in Singapore?
RHTLaw Asia LLP leads in courts and jurisdiction with 1 case between January 2025 to January 2026, followed by Attorney-General's Chambers (1 case) and Colin Seow Chambers LLC (1 case). 15 firms appeared in courts and jurisdiction cases during this period.
Who are the leading Courts and Jurisdiction lawyers in Singapore?
Huang Qianwei is the most active courts and jurisdiction lawyer in Singapore with 1 case appearance between January 2025 to January 2026, followed by Wong Woon Kwong (1) and Teo Wei Ren Marcus (1). 29 lawyers appeared in courts and jurisdiction cases during this period.
Which judges handle the most Courts and Jurisdiction cases in Singapore?
See Kee Oon has handled 2 cases in courts and jurisdiction between January 2025 to January 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Judith Prakash (1 case) and Sundaresh Menon (1 case) are also among the most active. 12 judges heard courts and jurisdiction cases.
How many courts and jurisdiction cases are heard in Singapore courts?
Between January 2025 to January 2026, 8 reported judgments involved courts and jurisdiction in Singapore courts. The majority were heard in the High Court (General Division) (2 cases).
What are the main sub-topics in Singapore courts and jurisdiction cases?
The main sub-topics in Singapore courts and jurisdiction litigation between January 2025 to January 2026 were Jurisdiction (2 cases), Vexatious litigants (1 case), Jurisdiction — Ouster — Telecommunications Act 1999 and Code of Practice for Info-Communication Facilities in Buildings (1 case), Jurisdiction — Appellate — Whether the Appel-late Division of the High Court has the jurisdiction to set aside an order of the General Division of the High Court (1 case).