Leading International Law Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore
7 reported cases · October 2023 to September 2026
Updated
What did Singapore courts decide in International Law?
Singapore courts issued 7 reported International Law judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (2), of the 1 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Appeal dismissed (1). This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.
Compiled from 7 reported International Law judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.
Outcome data updated
Across 7 reported International Law judgments in Singapore courts (October 2023 to September 2026), WongPartnership LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (2 cases), Lau Hui Ming Kenny is the most active lawyer (2 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.
Overview
International Law appears in 7 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Conventions — Obligations under the Hague Convention of 18 March 1970 on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters (1), Sovereign immunity — State Immunity Act 1979 (1) and Conventions — Articles 3 and 13(a) of the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (1). The most active judge by reported case count is Andre Maniam (2 cases) and the most active firm is WongPartnership LLP (2 cases).
Which law firms handle the most International Law cases in Singapore?
WongPartnership LLP leads in International Law with 2 cases between October 2023 and September 2026, followed by Providence Law Asia LLC (2 cases) and TSMP Law Corporation (1 cases). 12 firms appeared in International Law cases during this period.
Who are the leading International Law lawyers in Singapore?
Lau Hui Ming Kenny is the most active International Law lawyer in Singapore with 2 case appearances between October 2023 and September 2026, followed by Axl Rizqy (2) and Vergis S Abraham (2).
Which judges handle the most International Law cases in Singapore?
Andre Maniam has handled 2 International Law cases between October 2023 and September 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Sundaresh Menon (2 cases) and Steven Chong (2 cases) are also among the most active.
How many International Law cases are reported in Singapore courts?
7 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve International Law, most often decided by Andre Maniam.
What are the main sub-topics in Singapore International Law cases?
The main sub-topics are Conventions — Obligations under the Hague Convention of 18 March 1970 on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters (1), Sovereign immunity — State Immunity Act 1979 (1) and Conventions — Articles 3 and 13(a) of the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (1).
Case Volume by Year
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
Conventions — Obligations under the Hague Convention of 18 March 1970 on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters 1 case
Sovereign immunity — State Immunity Act 1979 1 case
Conventions — Articles 3 and 13(a) of the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction 1 case
Sovereign immunity — Sections 3(1), 4(1), and 11(1) State Immunity Act 1979 (2020 Rev Ed) 1 case
Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of other States 1 case
Sovereign immunity — Sections 3(1) and 11(1) State Immunity Act 1979 (2020 Rev Ed) 1 case
Sovereign immunity — Sections 3, 11, 15 and 16 State Immunity Act 1979 (2020 Rev Ed) 1 case
Criminal acts — High seas 1 case
Key Statutes
Court Distribution
Cases
Methodology & disclaimer
Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.