Leading Injunctions Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore
22 reported cases · April 2023 to June 2026
Updated
What did Singapore courts decide in Injunctions?
Singapore courts issued 22 reported Injunctions judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (16), of the 3 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Application dismissed (2). This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.
Compiled from 22 reported Injunctions judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.
Outcome data updated
Across 22 reported Injunctions judgments in Singapore courts (April 2023 to June 2026), Drew & Napier LLC is the most active firm by reported case count (5 cases), Shermaine Ng Shi Min is the most active lawyer (2 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.
Overview
Injunctions appears in 22 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Mareva injunction — Setting aside (3), Application (2) and Mandatory injunction — Order to remove structures that have been installed (2). The most active judge by reported case count is Philip Jeyaretnam (6 cases) and the most active firm is Drew & Napier LLC (5 cases).
Which law firms handle the most Injunctions cases in Singapore?
Drew & Napier LLC leads in Injunctions with 5 cases between April 2023 and June 2026, followed by Shook Lin & Bok LLP (3 cases) and Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (3 cases). 38 firms appeared in Injunctions cases during this period.
Who are the leading Injunctions lawyers in Singapore?
Shermaine Ng Shi Min is the most active Injunctions lawyer in Singapore with 2 case appearances between April 2023 and June 2026, followed by Kishan Pillay s/o Rajagopal Pillay (2) and Ong Tun Wei Danny (2).
Which judges handle the most Injunctions cases in Singapore?
Philip Jeyaretnam has handled 6 Injunctions cases between April 2023 and June 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Chan Seng Onn (2 cases) and Tan Siong Thye (2 cases) are also among the most active.
How many Injunctions cases are reported in Singapore courts?
22 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Injunctions, most often decided by Philip Jeyaretnam.
What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Injunctions cases?
The main sub-topics are Mareva injunction — Setting aside (3), Application (2) and Mandatory injunction — Order to remove structures that have been installed (2).
Case Volume by Year
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
Mareva injunction — Setting aside 3 cases
Application 2 cases
Mandatory injunction — Order to remove structures that have been installed 2 cases
Prohibitory injunction — Order to restrain from impeding or obstructing entry of vehicles 2 cases
Unconscionability 2 cases
Interlocutory injunction 2 cases
Purposes for grant — Protection of contractual rights 2 cases
Purposes for grant 1 case
Mandatory injunction — Interim mandatory injunction compelling seller of ship to furnish security 1 case
Interlocutory injunction— Whether defendant acted fraudulently in making demand 1 case
Mareva injunction — Court’s powers under section 12A of the International Arbitration Act 1994 (2020 Rev Ed) 1 case
Erinford Injunction 1 case
Purposes for grant — Restraint of proceedings 1 case
Mandatory injunction 1 case
Interlocutory injunction — Interlocutory injunction giving effect to restraint of trade clauses 1 case
Interlocutory injunction — Applicable test for interlocutory injunctions giving effect to restraint of trade clauses 1 case
Erinford injunctions 1 case
Injunction quia timet 1 case
Purposes for grant — Restraint of wrongs 1 case
Interim injunction — Plaintiff’s undertaking as to damages — Whether undertaking ought to be enforced 1 case
Key Statutes
Court Distribution
Cases
Methodology & disclaimer
Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.