Leading Injunctions Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore
18 reported cases · January 2024 to June 2026
Updated
What did Singapore courts decide in Injunctions?
Singapore courts issued 18 reported Injunctions judgments between 2024–2026, most in SGHC (12), of the 3 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Application dismissed (2). This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.
Compiled from 18 reported Injunctions judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.
Outcome data updated
Across 18 reported Injunctions judgments in Singapore courts (January 2024 to June 2026), Drew & Napier LLC is the most active firm by reported case count (5 cases), Shermaine Ng Shi Min is the most active lawyer (2 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.
Overview
The dataset records 16 Injunctions judgments handed down between January 2024 and May 2026, ranking the practice area 29th of 49 tracked areas. The General Division of the High Court (SGHC) heard the most, with the Appellate Division (SGHC(A)), the High Court (International) (SGHC(I)), the Court of Appeal (International) (SGCA(I)) and the Family Division (SGHCF) also featuring. A total of 13 judges, 25 firms and 78 lawyers appeared. The most common issues were setting aside a Mareva injunction (3 cases), mandatory injunctions to remove installed structures (2 cases), and prohibitory injunctions restraining the obstruction of vehicle entry (2 cases).
Data coverage: between January 2024 and May 2026
Which law firms handle the most Injunctions cases in Singapore?
Drew & Napier LLC leads in Injunctions with 4 cases between January 2024 and May 2026, followed by Shook Lin & Bok LLP (3 cases) and Breakpoint LLC, Aequitas Law LLP, Setia Law LLC and WongPartnership LLP with 2 cases each. 25 firms appeared during this period.
Who are the leading Injunctions lawyers in Singapore?
Ryan Mark Lopez, Ong Tun Wei Danny and Teo Jason each recorded 2 Injunctions appearances between January 2024 and May 2026, among the most active lawyers in the dataset, alongside Lee Jin Loong, Zhang Haowei Elvis and Cavinder Bull with 2 appearances each.
Which judges handle the most Injunctions cases in Singapore?
Philip Jeyaretnam has handled 5 Injunctions cases between January 2024 and May 2026, the most of any judge in the dataset. Choo Han Teck (2 cases) and Tan Siong Thye (2 cases) are also among the most active, with Judith Prakash and See Kee Oon each recording 1 case.
How many Injunctions cases are heard in Singapore courts?
The dataset records 16 Injunctions judgments handed down between January 2024 and May 2026. The General Division of the High Court (SGHC) was the primary court, with cases also heard in the Appellate Division and the High Court (International).
What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Injunctions cases?
The leading sub-topics are setting aside a Mareva injunction (3 cases), mandatory injunctions to remove installed structures (2 cases), prohibitory injunctions restraining obstruction of vehicle entry (2 cases) and unconscionability (2 cases), based on catchwords across the 16 judgments.
Case Volume by Year
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
Mareva injunction — Setting aside 3 cases
Application 2 cases
Mandatory injunction — Order to remove structures that have been installed 2 cases
Prohibitory injunction — Order to restrain from impeding or obstructing entry of vehicles 2 cases
Unconscionability 2 cases
Purposes for grant 1 case
Mandatory injunction — Interim mandatory injunction compelling seller of ship to furnish security 1 case
Interlocutory injunction— Whether defendant acted fraudulently in making demand 1 case
Mareva injunction — Court’s powers under section 12A of the International Arbitration Act 1994 (2020 Rev Ed) 1 case
Erinford Injunction 1 case
Purposes for grant — Restraint of proceedings 1 case
Interlocutory injunction 1 case
Mandatory injunction 1 case
Interlocutory injunction — Interlocutory injunction giving effect to restraint of trade clauses 1 case
Interlocutory injunction — Applicable test for interlocutory injunctions giving effect to restraint of trade clauses 1 case
Erinford injunctions 1 case
Key Statutes
Court Distribution
Cases
Methodology & disclaimer
Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.