Leading Land Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

The Appellate Division (Kannan Ramesh JAD, Debbie Ong Siew Ling JAD and See Kee Oon JAD) dismissed the appeal in an ex tempore judgment.

The judge granted the application with modifications.

Goh Yihan J dismissed the application with costs to the respondent, holding that it was neither necessary nor expedient to order a sale because the application was insufficiently particularised and…

Choo Han Teck J allowed the application.

The District Court allowed the application and dismissed the counterclaim.

Tan Siong Thye J allowed the applications in part, granting the order in OS 809 requiring Mdm Cheong and Mr Chang to reinstate the rear windows of Unit 53, and dismissed every other prayer.

District Judge Tay Jingxi allowed the claim but awarded only nominal damages of $1,000, as the management corporation had not proved or quantified any loss.

The High Court dismissed the application for permission to appeal against the District Judge's dismissal of DC/OA 41.

The Appellate Division, by a majority, dismissed the appeal on liability, quantum and costs, and ordered the appellant to pay costs of the appeal fixed at $30,000 inclusive of disbursements.

The High Court allowed the claim in part.

The court granted an easement of right of way over the service road to the loading bay and bin centre, free of charge for refuse collection vehicles and, for other vehicles, on payment of charges no…

The court declined to imply an easement under s 99 but held that it will create an easement of way under s 97A once the MCST satisfies s 97A(2)(c).

Tan Siong Thye SJ refused Mdm Ng's application in OA 41 and allowed Mdm Chen's application in OA 44 in part, with modifications, declaring that the beneficial interests follow the legal title: Mdm…

The Appellate Division dismissed both appeals, upholding the order for sale with the proceeds divided equally and the dismissal of Mr Gunawan's claim to sole beneficial ownership.

Tan Siong Thye SJ refused Mdm Ng's application in OA 41 and allowed Mdm Chen's application in OA 44 in part, with modifications, declaring that the beneficial interests follow the legal title: Mdm…

The High Court dismissed Cheng's claim and allowed Mdm Yong's counterclaim in part.

The court dismissed both applications because the caveats were positively misleading and prejudiced Mr Chan, and ordered the applicant to pay the respondents costs of S$20,000, including…

Goh Yihan JC found the caveat had not been lodged vexatiously, frivolously or not in good faith and was justified, but allowed the alternative prayer.

The High Court dismissed the objections and allowed the committee members' application, ordering the sale of the property to Coliwoo.

The court allowed the application and granted orders in terms of prayers 1 to 5 and 8, approving the collective sale of Chuan Park under the sale and purchase agreement.

The District Court dismissed the claim in full.

District Judge Chiah Kok Khun allowed the claim, finding a breach of s 29(1)(b) of the Act, and awarded the owners $10,978.00 for the cost of repairing the termite damage.

Chan Seng Onn SJ allowed the buyer and the bank to intervene, but made no variation to the injunction, holding that none was needed.

District Judge Tay Jingxi allowed the claim but awarded only nominal damages of $1,000, as the management corporation had not proved or quantified any loss.

District Judge Tay Jingxi allowed the claim but awarded only nominal damages of $1,000, as the management corporation had not proved or quantified any loss.

The court allowed the claim in part.

The tribunal dismissed the claim and made no order as to costs, holding that the claimant had not proved a breach of the standard of care or that any breach caused her loss.

The Appellate Division (Kannan Ramesh JAD, Debbie Ong Siew Ling JAD and See Kee Oon JAD) dismissed the appeal in an ex tempore judgment.

The Magistrate's Court allowed the application in part.

The District Judge dismissed the estate's claim, finding that the defendant owed a duty of care but was not negligent and did not breach the condominium by-laws.

The High Court declined to grant the orders sought.

The court dismissed Mr Kwon's application and Covenson's counterclaim for reinstatement costs, and allowed Covenson's counterclaim for additional rent of $40,000.

The High Court dismissed both applications.

The court declined to imply an easement under s 99 but held that it will create an easement of way under s 97A once the MCST satisfies s 97A(2)(c).

Christopher Tan JC accepted the defendants' submission of no case to answer and dismissed all of the plaintiff's claims, finding that they were not established even to a prima facie standard.

The court allowed the claims in part.

The court dismissed the application for an extension of time, holding that the proposed appeal would be hopeless even taking the fresh evidence into account.

The court dismissed both applications.

Wong Li Kok, Alex JC allowed the application and granted the two temporary easements, with broad liberty to Hu Lee to apply for compensation, more than once if needed, and to resolve operational…

The Appellate Division allowed the appeal and set aside the judgment below.

Aedit Abdullah J allowed the plaintiff's claim in part.