Leading Administrative Law Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore
19 reported cases · May 2023 to June 2026
Updated
What did Singapore courts decide in Administrative Law?
Singapore courts issued 19 reported Administrative Law judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (16), of the 5 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Appeal dismissed (2). This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.
Compiled from 19 reported Administrative Law judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.
Outcome data updated
Across 19 reported Administrative Law judgments in Singapore courts (May 2023 to June 2026), Attorney-General's Chambers is the most active firm by reported case count (7 cases), Poon Guokun Nicholas is the most active lawyer (2 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.
Overview
Administrative Law appears in 19 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Remedies — Declaration (4), Remedies — Quashing order (4) and Judicial Review (2). The most active judge by reported case count is Kwek Mean Luck (4 cases) and the most active firm is Attorney-General's Chambers (7 cases).
Which law firms handle the most Administrative Law cases in Singapore?
Attorney-General's Chambers leads in Administrative Law with 7 cases between May 2023 and June 2026, followed by Breakpoint LLC (2 cases) and Carson Law Chambers (2 cases). 29 firms appeared in Administrative Law cases during this period.
Who are the leading Administrative Law lawyers in Singapore?
Poon Guokun Nicholas is the most active Administrative Law lawyer in Singapore with 2 case appearances between May 2023 and June 2026, followed by Gan Yingtian Andrea (2) and Lim Tean (2).
Which judges handle the most Administrative Law cases in Singapore?
Kwek Mean Luck has handled 4 Administrative Law cases between May 2023 and June 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. See Kee Oon (3 cases) and Andre Maniam (3 cases) are also among the most active.
How many Administrative Law cases are reported in Singapore courts?
19 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Administrative Law, most often decided by Kwek Mean Luck.
What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Administrative Law cases?
The main sub-topics are Remedies — Declaration (4), Remedies — Quashing order (4) and Judicial Review (2).
Case Volume by Year
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
Remedies — Declaration 4 cases
Remedies — Quashing order 4 cases
Judicial Review 2 cases
Judicial review 2 cases
Judicial review — Wednesbury unreasonableness 2 cases
Remedies 1 case
Judicial review — Extension of time 1 case
Judicial Review — Exhaustion of alternative statutory remedies 1 case
Judicial review — Duty to give reasons — Whether there was a breach of a duty to give reasons 1 case
Judicial review — Application for leave to apply for judicial review to quash the Coroner’s findings 1 case
Natural justice — Allegations of breach of natural justice 1 case
Natural justice 1 case
Judicial review — Principles relating to review of decisions of religious associations 1 case
Disciplinary proceedings 1 case
Judicial review — Irrelevant considerations 1 case
Natural justice — Procedural fairness — Sufficient information and opportunity to present case 1 case
Remedies — Prohibiting order 1 case
Disciplinary tribunals 1 case
Remedies — Prohibition order 1 case
Natural justice — Breach of fair hearing rule 1 case
Natural justice — Breach of rule against bias 1 case
Remedies — Mandatory order 1 case
Key Statutes
Court Distribution
Cases
Methodology & disclaimer
Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.