Leading Credit and Security Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore
31 reported cases · January 2023 to July 2026
Updated
What did Singapore courts decide in Credit and Security?
Singapore courts issued 31 reported Credit and Security judgments (2023–2026), most in the High Court (22), two monetary awards were recorded, of $2,000 and $466,700. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.
Compiled from 31 reported Credit and Security judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.
Outcome data updated
Across 31 reported Credit and Security judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to July 2026), WongPartnership LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (8 cases). The lists below count how often named firms and lawyers appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.
Overview
Credit and Security appears in 31 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most active judge by reported case count is Goh Yihan (4 cases) and the most active firm is WongPartnership LLP (8 cases).
Which law firms handle the most Credit and Security cases in Singapore?
WongPartnership LLP leads in Credit and Security with 8 cases between January 2023 and July 2026, followed by Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (4 cases). 56 firms appeared in Credit and Security cases during this period.
Who are the leading Credit and Security lawyers in Singapore?
Kenneth Tan (3 cases), Chew Kei-Jin (3 cases) and Lee Chia Ming (3 cases) appear as counsel in reported Credit and Security cases between January 2023 and July 2026.
Which judges handle the most Credit and Security cases in Singapore?
Goh Yihan has handled 4 Credit and Security cases between January 2023 and July 2026, the most of any Singapore judge.
How many Credit and Security cases are reported in Singapore courts?
31 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Credit and Security, most often decided by Goh Yihan.
Case Volume by Year
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
Guarantees and indemnities 7 cases
-
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, though for different reasons from the Judge, holding that Alvance had become a party to the FSA so that LEG was liable under the Guarantee; the Judge's…
Court of Appeal (International) · 8 October 2024 · [2024] SGCA(I) 7 -
The court allowed Renault's claims in part.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 14 February 2024 · [2024] SGHC(I) 6 -
Vinodh Coomaraswamy J in substance dismissed both appeals.
High Court · 31 January 2024 · [2024] SGHC 11 -
The court granted summary judgment on the merits in favour of the claimant and ordered judgment entered against the defendant.
High Court · 26 December 2023 · [2023] SGHC 357 -
Goh Yihan J allowed the appeal in part.
High Court · 13 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 292 - + 2 more cases
Money and moneylenders — Illegal moneylending 6 cases
-
The Appellate Division (Debbie Ong Siew Ling JAD and See Kee Oon JAD) dismissed both appeals, finding the Judge's decision was not plainly wrong or against the weight of the evidence.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 16 April 2026 · [2026] SGHC(A) 10 -
The High Court (S Mohan J) allowed the claims in all three actions.
High Court · 3 November 2025 · [2025] SGHC 217 -
The High Court dismissed the defendants' application in HC/SUM 1733/2025, leaving ORC 619 in place, and allowed LLS's application in HC/SUM 2095/2025, ordering that the interim injunction in ORC 3351…
High Court · 30 September 2025 · [2025] SGHC 194 -
The court dismissed Mface's claim, holding that Mface was an unlicensed moneylender, so the loan agreement was unenforceable and the loan irrecoverable under s 14(2) of the Moneylenders Act.
High Court · 16 September 2024 · [2024] SGHC 234 -
The High Court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the summary judgment for the claimant in the sum of $451,089, holding the agreement enforceable in full.
High Court · 12 April 2024 · [2024] SGHC 101 - + 1 more case
Money and moneylenders — Loans of money 4 cases
-
The Appellate Division allowed the appeal in part.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 26 January 2026 · [2026] SGHC(A) 3 -
The court dismissed Mface's claim, holding that Mface was an unlicensed moneylender, so the loan agreement was unenforceable and the loan irrecoverable under s 14(2) of the Moneylenders Act.
High Court · 16 September 2024 · [2024] SGHC 234 -
Mohamed Faizal JC allowed the claim in part, granting judgment for the claimant for $466,700, together with interest and costs, rather than the $525,200 in the acknowledgment.
High Court · 15 August 2024 · [2024] SGHC 207 -
The High Court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the summary judgment for the claimant in the sum of $451,089, holding the agreement enforceable in full.
High Court · 12 April 2024 · [2024] SGHC 101
Performance bond 4 cases
-
The High Court allowed the application.
High Court · 24 June 2025 · [2025] SGHC 114 -
Vinodh Coomaraswamy J in substance dismissed both appeals.
High Court · 31 January 2024 · [2024] SGHC 11 -
The Appellate Division allowed the appeal in part.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 2 January 2024 · [2024] SGHC(A) 1 -
The High Court allowed the application on the ground that SDK's demand was invalid, though it rejected the fraud and implied term arguments.
High Court · 4 August 2023 · [2023] SGHC 210
Performance bond — Whether call on performance bond was valid 1 case
-
The High Court allowed the application, holding that the demand on the performance bond was not valid and that HSBC Life was not obliged to pay on it on the basis of the SO's decision or…
High Court · 30 July 2026 · [2026] SGHC 159
Mortgage of real property — Mortgagee’s rights — Whether lender entitled to impose monthly late payment charges for instalments due after recalling loan 1 case
-
After UOB amended its application to drop the late payment charge and the variation prayers, the Assistant Registrar granted an order in terms of the amended originating application.
High Court Registrar · 18 May 2026 · [2026] SGHCR 16
Trust receipts 1 case
-
The court allowed the claim in part: it dismissed Valency's claims against JSW and Oldendorff and granted judgment for Valency against Unicorn for conversion of 38,000MT in the sum of USD2,694,451…
High Court · 28 March 2025 · [2025] SGHC 50
Bonds — Construction 1 case
-
The High Court dismissed DJY's application for an injunction against DJZ and the bank.
High Court · 26 November 2024 · [2024] SGHC 301
Performance bond — Strict compliance with terms when making call on performance bond — Whether valid demand was made 1 case
-
The High Court dismissed DJY's application for an injunction against DJZ and the bank.
High Court · 26 November 2024 · [2024] SGHC 301
Performance bond — Unconscionability exception — Whether call on performance bond unconscionable and ought to be restrained 1 case
-
The High Court dismissed DJY's application for an injunction against DJZ and the bank.
High Court · 26 November 2024 · [2024] SGHC 301
Bonds — Assignment 1 case
-
Christopher Tan JC dismissed the application and said he would hear the parties on costs.
High Court · 13 November 2024 · [2024] SGHC 292
Charges — Extension of time for registering charge created by company 1 case
-
The court dismissed the application for an extension of time to register the mortgage, with liberty for the applicant to reapply with proper evidence and prayers.
High Court · 12 August 2024 · [2024] SGHC 204
Guarantees and indemnities — Contracts of indemnity — Letter of indemnity presented by beneficiary for payment under letter of credit — Beneficiary representing and warranting under letter of indemnity the “existence, authenticity and validity” of signed bills of lading “issued or endorsed to the order of” issuing bank — Whether representation and warranty construed literally or purposively — Whether representation and warranty contains “element of futurity” 1 case
-
Goh Yihan J dismissed all of BCP's claims against CAO.
High Court · 5 June 2024 · [2024] SGHC 145
Guarantees and indemnities — Contracts of indemnity 1 case
-
The Court of Appeal allowed CACIB's appeals solely on the ground that PPT had breached its warranty of marketable title in the LOI, and gave judgment for CACIB in the sum of US$10,319,470.81, subject…
Court of Appeal (International) · 24 October 2023 · [2023] SGCA(I) 7
Money and moneylenders 1 case
-
Chua Lee Ming J dismissed both OA 421 and OSB 38 and ordered SCP and Mr Sim each to pay costs fixed at $5,000 plus disbursements.
High Court · 26 September 2023 · [2023] SGHC 269
Remedies — Winding-up — Injunction to restrain bringing of winding up application 1 case
-
The High Court dismissed the application and declined to grant the injunction, finding that Abcom raised no triable issue on the timing of repayment once the six-month moratorium had ended and could…
High Court · 31 August 2023 · [2023] SGHC 242
Remedies — Judicial management 1 case
-
Hri Kumar Nair J allowed the judicial management application, dismissed Delta's registrar's appeal and its IRDA summons with costs to be paid by Delta to Gulf International, and made no order on the…
High Court · 24 May 2023 · [2023] SGHC 151
Remedies — Receivership 1 case
-
The court dismissed both Originating Application No 873 of 2022 and Originating Application No 883 of 2022.
High Court · 24 February 2023 · [2023] SGHC 43
Key Statutes
Court Distribution
Cases
Page 1 of 2-
The High Court allowed the application, holding that the demand on the performance bond was not valid and that HSBC Life was not obliged to pay on it on the basis of the SO's decision or…
High Court · 30 July 2026 · [2026] SGHC 159 -
After UOB amended its application to drop the late payment charge and the variation prayers, the Assistant Registrar granted an order in terms of the amended originating application.
High Court Registrar · 18 May 2026 · [2026] SGHCR 16 -
The Appellate Division (Debbie Ong Siew Ling JAD and See Kee Oon JAD) dismissed both appeals, finding the Judge's decision was not plainly wrong or against the weight of the evidence.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 16 April 2026 · [2026] SGHC(A) 10 -
The Appellate Division allowed the appeal in part.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 26 January 2026 · [2026] SGHC(A) 3 -
The High Court (S Mohan J) allowed the claims in all three actions.
High Court · 3 November 2025 · [2025] SGHC 217 -
The High Court dismissed the defendants' application in HC/SUM 1733/2025, leaving ORC 619 in place, and allowed LLS's application in HC/SUM 2095/2025, ordering that the interim injunction in ORC 3351…
High Court · 30 September 2025 · [2025] SGHC 194 -
The High Court allowed the application.
High Court · 24 June 2025 · [2025] SGHC 114 -
The court allowed the claim in part: it dismissed Valency's claims against JSW and Oldendorff and granted judgment for Valency against Unicorn for conversion of 38,000MT in the sum of USD2,694,451…
High Court · 28 March 2025 · [2025] SGHC 50 -
The court allowed the application in part.
High Court · 28 November 2024 · [2024] SGHC 302 -
The High Court dismissed DJY's application for an injunction against DJZ and the bank.
High Court · 26 November 2024 · [2024] SGHC 301 -
Christopher Tan JC dismissed the application and said he would hear the parties on costs.
High Court · 13 November 2024 · [2024] SGHC 292 -
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, though for different reasons from the Judge, holding that Alvance had become a party to the FSA so that LEG was liable under the Guarantee; the Judge's…
Court of Appeal (International) · 8 October 2024 · [2024] SGCA(I) 7 -
The court dismissed Mface's claim, holding that Mface was an unlicensed moneylender, so the loan agreement was unenforceable and the loan irrecoverable under s 14(2) of the Moneylenders Act.
High Court · 16 September 2024 · [2024] SGHC 234 -
Mohamed Faizal JC allowed the claim in part, granting judgment for the claimant for $466,700, together with interest and costs, rather than the $525,200 in the acknowledgment.
High Court · 15 August 2024 · [2024] SGHC 207 -
The court dismissed the application for an extension of time to register the mortgage, with liberty for the applicant to reapply with proper evidence and prayers.
High Court · 12 August 2024 · [2024] SGHC 204 -
Goh Yihan J dismissed all of BCP's claims against CAO.
High Court · 5 June 2024 · [2024] SGHC 145 -
The High Court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the summary judgment for the claimant in the sum of $451,089, holding the agreement enforceable in full.
High Court · 12 April 2024 · [2024] SGHC 101 -
The court allowed Renault's claims in part.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 14 February 2024 · [2024] SGHC(I) 6 -
Vinodh Coomaraswamy J in substance dismissed both appeals.
High Court · 31 January 2024 · [2024] SGHC 11 -
The Appellate Division allowed the appeal in part.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 2 January 2024 · [2024] SGHC(A) 1 -
The court granted summary judgment on the merits in favour of the claimant and ordered judgment entered against the defendant.
High Court · 26 December 2023 · [2023] SGHC 357 -
The Court of Appeal allowed CACIB's appeals solely on the ground that PPT had breached its warranty of marketable title in the LOI, and gave judgment for CACIB in the sum of US$10,319,470.81, subject…
Court of Appeal (International) · 24 October 2023 · [2023] SGCA(I) 7 -
Goh Yihan J allowed the appeal in part.
High Court · 13 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 292 -
Chua Lee Ming J dismissed both OA 421 and OSB 38 and ordered SCP and Mr Sim each to pay costs fixed at $5,000 plus disbursements.
High Court · 26 September 2023 · [2023] SGHC 269 -
The High Court dismissed the application and declined to grant the injunction, finding that Abcom raised no triable issue on the timing of repayment once the six-month moratorium had ended and could…
High Court · 31 August 2023 · [2023] SGHC 242
Methodology & disclaimer
Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Singapore court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.