Leading Agency Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore
18 reported cases · January 2023 to October 2026
Updated
What did Singapore courts decide in Agency?
Singapore courts issued 18 reported Agency judgments (2023–2026), most in the High Court (13), one monetary award was recorded, of $20,275. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.
Compiled from 18 reported Agency judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.
Outcome data updated
Across 18 reported Agency judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to October 2026), Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (5 cases). The lists below count how often named firms and lawyers appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.
Overview
Agency appears in 18 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most active judge by reported case count is Wong Li Kok, Alex (3 cases) and the most active firm is Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (5 cases).
Which law firms handle the most Agency cases in Singapore?
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP leads in Agency with 5 cases between January 2023 and October 2026, followed by Drew & Napier LLC (3 cases). 27 firms appeared in Agency cases during this period.
Who are the leading Agency lawyers in Singapore?
Tomoyuki Lewis Ban (2 cases), Mulani Prakash P (2 cases) and Lim Tean (2 cases) appear as counsel in reported Agency cases between January 2023 and October 2026.
Which judges handle the most Agency cases in Singapore?
Wong Li Kok, Alex has handled 3 Agency cases between January 2023 and October 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Hoo Sheau Peng (2 cases) follows.
How many Agency cases are reported in Singapore courts?
18 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Agency, most often decided by Wong Li Kok, Alex.
Case Volume by Year
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
Third party and principal’s relations — Contractual relations 3 cases
-
The Court of Appeal dismissed AAI's appeal.
Court of Appeal · 7 February 2024 · [2024] SGCA 3 -
Hoo Sheau Peng J convicted the first accused of 180 of his 189 charges and the second accused of 169 of her 178 charges, finding every underlying offence completed.
High Court · 24 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 299 -
Mavis Chionh Sze Chyi J dismissed the Plaintiff's claim against both Defendants.
High Court · 17 January 2023 · [2023] SGHC 12
Ratification — Acts 2 cases
-
The court allowed OA 1316 and set aside the award under Art 34(2)(a)(i) of the Model Law as there was no valid arbitration agreement.
High Court · 6 October 2026 · [2026] SGHC 199 -
The court allowed the appeal, holding that AAI's successful action below could not stand.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 3 February 2023 · [2023] SGHC(A) 6
Ratification — Conditions 2 cases
-
The court allowed UOB's claim against Maersk for breach of the contracts of carriage evidenced by the bills of lading and granted judgment for US$39,372,300.00 with interest at 5.33% per annum from…
High Court · 4 November 2024 · [2024] SGHC 282 -
The Court of Appeal dismissed AAI's appeal.
Court of Appeal · 7 February 2024 · [2024] SGCA 3
Termination 1 case
-
The Magistrate's Court allowed the claim, entering judgment for Huttons for $28,080, being $26,000 plus the then-prevailing GST, dismissed the defendant's counterclaim, and directed written…
Magistrate Court · 23 January 2026 · [2026] SGMC 12
Rights of agent — Indemnity 1 case
-
Kristy Tan J dismissed the claimants' negligence claim and dismissed Ms Loh's third party claim against the bank.
High Court · 22 December 2025 · [2025] SGHC 258
Evidence of agency — Duties of agent — Breach — Remedies 1 case
-
The court allowed Kelvin's claim and held Wilson and Crowdex jointly and severally liable to pay him $97,310.
High Court · 27 October 2025 · [2025] SGHC 210
Evidence of agency — When general evidence of control is insufficient 1 case
-
Wong Li Kok, Alex J dismissed the firm's claims entirely and said he would hear the parties on costs.
High Court · 5 September 2025 · [2025] SGHC 177
Principal — Holding out 1 case
-
The court dismissed Mr Glassberg's claim for damages and interest in full, finding against him on authority, contract, tort, the Unfair Contract Terms Act and vicarious liability.
High Court · 10 January 2025 · [2025] SGHC 4
Third party and principal’s relations — Tortious liability 1 case
-
The court dismissed all the plaintiff's claims against both defendants.
High Court · 2 August 2024 · [2024] SGHC 200
Rights of agent — Commission — Whether agent effective cause of transaction 1 case
-
The High Court allowed the claim in part.
High Court · 8 July 2024 · [2024] SGHC 174
Principal — Tortious liabilities 1 case
-
The High Court allowed Ms Tang's appeal in DCA 22 in part, affirming her liability for defamation and the dismissal of her counterclaim but substituting nominal damages of $1 for the $10,000 award,…
High Court · 29 June 2024 · [2024] SGHC 167
Ratification — Effect 1 case
-
The Court of Appeal dismissed AAI's appeal.
Court of Appeal · 7 February 2024 · [2024] SGCA 3
Principal — Undisclosed — Rights and liabilities 1 case
-
The Court of Appeal dismissed AAI's appeal.
Court of Appeal · 7 February 2024 · [2024] SGCA 3
Classes of agents — Brokers 1 case
-
Hoo Sheau Peng J convicted the first accused of 180 of his 189 charges and the second accused of 169 of her 178 charges, finding every underlying offence completed.
High Court · 24 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 299
Principal — Attribution of knowledge and acts 1 case
-
Hoo Sheau Peng J convicted the first accused of 180 of his 189 charges and the second accused of 169 of her 178 charges, finding every underlying offence completed.
High Court · 24 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 299
Duties of agent — Compliance with regulatory requirements 1 case
-
Hoo Sheau Peng J convicted the first accused of 180 of his 189 charges and the second accused of 169 of her 178 charges, finding every underlying offence completed.
High Court · 24 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 299
Third party and principal’s relations 1 case
-
Simon Thorley IJ allowed the claims in part.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 6 September 2023 · [2023] SGHC(I) 13
Third party and principal’s relations — Contractual relations — Attribution of agent’s knowledge of his own breach to principal 1 case
-
Goh Yihan JC dismissed Axis's claim for the arranger fee.
High Court · 31 August 2023 · [2023] SGHC 243
Principal — Undisclosed 1 case
-
Mavis Chionh Sze Chyi J dismissed the Plaintiff's claim against both Defendants.
High Court · 17 January 2023 · [2023] SGHC 12
Key Statutes
Court Distribution
Cases
-
The court allowed OA 1316 and set aside the award under Art 34(2)(a)(i) of the Model Law as there was no valid arbitration agreement.
High Court · 6 October 2026 · [2026] SGHC 199 -
The tribunal allowed the claim in full.
Small Claims Tribunal · 17 September 2026 · [2026] SGSCT 23 -
The Magistrate's Court allowed the claim, entering judgment for Huttons for $28,080, being $26,000 plus the then-prevailing GST, dismissed the defendant's counterclaim, and directed written…
Magistrate Court · 23 January 2026 · [2026] SGMC 12 -
Kristy Tan J dismissed the claimants' negligence claim and dismissed Ms Loh's third party claim against the bank.
High Court · 22 December 2025 · [2025] SGHC 258 -
The court allowed Kelvin's claim and held Wilson and Crowdex jointly and severally liable to pay him $97,310.
High Court · 27 October 2025 · [2025] SGHC 210 -
Wong Li Kok, Alex J dismissed the firm's claims entirely and said he would hear the parties on costs.
High Court · 5 September 2025 · [2025] SGHC 177 -
The court dismissed Mr Glassberg's claim for damages and interest in full, finding against him on authority, contract, tort, the Unfair Contract Terms Act and vicarious liability.
High Court · 10 January 2025 · [2025] SGHC 4 -
The court allowed UOB's claim against Maersk for breach of the contracts of carriage evidenced by the bills of lading and granted judgment for US$39,372,300.00 with interest at 5.33% per annum from…
High Court · 4 November 2024 · [2024] SGHC 282 -
The court dismissed all the plaintiff's claims against both defendants.
High Court · 2 August 2024 · [2024] SGHC 200 -
The High Court allowed the claim in part.
High Court · 8 July 2024 · [2024] SGHC 174 -
The High Court allowed Ms Tang's appeal in DCA 22 in part, affirming her liability for defamation and the dismissal of her counterclaim but substituting nominal damages of $1 for the $10,000 award,…
High Court · 29 June 2024 · [2024] SGHC 167 -
The court dismissed JNHM's claim, holding that JNHM had not proved the IAC existed or that it governed its relationship with either defendant, so there was no repudiatory breach.
High Court · 20 March 2024 · [2024] SGHC 81 -
The Court of Appeal dismissed AAI's appeal.
Court of Appeal · 7 February 2024 · [2024] SGCA 3 -
Hoo Sheau Peng J convicted the first accused of 180 of his 189 charges and the second accused of 169 of her 178 charges, finding every underlying offence completed.
High Court · 24 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 299 -
Simon Thorley IJ allowed the claims in part.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 6 September 2023 · [2023] SGHC(I) 13 -
Goh Yihan JC dismissed Axis's claim for the arranger fee.
High Court · 31 August 2023 · [2023] SGHC 243 -
The court allowed the appeal, holding that AAI's successful action below could not stand.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 3 February 2023 · [2023] SGHC(A) 6 -
Mavis Chionh Sze Chyi J dismissed the Plaintiff's claim against both Defendants.
High Court · 17 January 2023 · [2023] SGHC 12
Methodology & disclaimer
Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Singapore court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.