Leading Criminal Law Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

262 reported cases · January 2023 to October 2026

Updated

What did Singapore courts decide in Criminal Law?

Singapore courts issued 262 reported Criminal Law judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (180), of the 108 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Appeal dismissed (42), the median monetary award recorded was $2,250. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.

Reported cases 262 (2023–2026)
By year 2026 (88) · 2025 (52) · 2024 (61) · 2023 (61)
By court SGHC (180) · SGCA (36) · SGDC (32) · SGMC (14)
Outcomes (108 parseable) Appeal dismissed (42) · Convicted (26) · Sentence imposed (18) · Appeal allowed (10) · Appeal allowed in part (6) · Application dismissed (4) · Acquitted (1) · Application allowed (1)
Median monetary award $2,250 (across 2 awards)
Most active counsel Eugene Singarajah Thuraisingam (11) · Anandan Bala (10) · Chooi Jing Yen (8) · David Menon (8) · Suang Wijaya (8)

Compiled from 262 reported Criminal Law judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.

Outcome data updated

Across 262 reported Criminal Law judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to October 2026), Eugene Thuraisingam LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (18 cases), Eugene Singarajah Thuraisingam is the most active lawyer (11 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.

Overview

Criminal Law appears in 262 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Statutory offences — Misuse of Drugs Act (43), Appeal (27) and Offences — Sexual offences (25). The most active judge by reported case count is Vincent Hoong (44 cases) and the most active firm is Eugene Thuraisingam LLP (18 cases).

Which law firms handle the most Criminal Law cases in Singapore?

Eugene Thuraisingam LLP leads in Criminal Law with 18 cases between January 2023 and October 2026, followed by Drew & Napier LLC (12 cases) and Allen & Gledhill LLP (10 cases). 175 firms appeared in Criminal Law cases during this period.

Who are the leading Criminal Law lawyers in Singapore?

Eugene Singarajah Thuraisingam is the most active Criminal Law lawyer in Singapore with 11 case appearances between January 2023 and October 2026, followed by Anandan Bala (10) and Suang Wijaya (8).

Which judges handle the most Criminal Law cases in Singapore?

Vincent Hoong has handled 44 Criminal Law cases between January 2023 and October 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Tay Yong Kwang (43 cases) and Sundaresh Menon (37 cases) are also among the most active.

How many Criminal Law cases are reported in Singapore courts?

262 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Criminal Law, most often decided by Vincent Hoong.

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Criminal Law cases?

The main sub-topics are Statutory offences — Misuse of Drugs Act (43), Appeal (27) and Offences — Sexual offences (25).

Case Volume by Year

61
23
61
24
52
25
88
26
2023–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Key Statutes

Penal Code (Cap 224)
cited in 168 cases
cited in 164 cases
cited in 63 cases
cited in 61 cases
cited in 29 cases
cited in 19 cases
cited in 18 cases
cited in 15 cases
cited in 14 cases
cited in 9 cases
Prisons Act
cited in 7 cases
cited in 7 cases
cited in 6 cases
Workplace Safety and Health Act
cited in 6 cases

Guides & Data

Court Distribution

Cases

Page 2 of 11
[2026] SGMC 86
Public Prosecutor v Poonareswaran Rajeeththan [2026] SGMC 86
10 July 2026
SGMC
[2026] SGDC 222
Public Prosecutor v. Lee Jia Ming
9 July 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGMC 85
Public Prosecutor v Chia Meng Chiang (Xie Mingchang) [2026] SGMC 85
6 July 2026
SGMC
[2026] SGDC 220
Public Prosecutor v Naufal Muzzammil s/o Jamal Mohamed [2026] SGDC 220
6 July 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGDC 212
PP v Indran Pillay 2026 SGDC 212
30 June 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGHC 136
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Toh Sze Ee
29 June 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGDC 186
Public Prosecutor Against Loy Wei Ezekiel and Gian Juat Ngim
26 June 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGDC 205
Public Prosecutor v Rajwant Singh Gill A/L Narajan Singh
23 June 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGHC 137
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Thina Vengades Rao
23 June 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGMC 76
PP v. Abdul Marzuq Waliyuddin Bin Abdul Majid
19 June 2026
SGMC
[2026] SGMC 73
Public Prosecutor v Zhou Jianwen [2026] SGMC 73
15 June 2026
SGMC
[2026] SGHC 122
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v BQG & Anor
8 June 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGDC 189
Public Prosecutor v. JHJ
4 June 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGHC 121
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v ANNAMALAI KOKILA PARVATHI AND OTHER APPEALS
4 June 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGDC 175
Public Prosecutor v Khoo Eng Ching
2 June 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGDC 180
Public Prosecutor v Mohanarajan s/o Selvarajan [2026] SGDC 180
26 May 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGHC 115
ANKIT SHARMA v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
25 May 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 113
JEH v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
22 May 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 110
GALVEZ MARY JOE BLANCO v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
21 May 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGCA 23
Low Sze Song v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
19 May 2026
SGCA
[2026] SGHC 107
LING ZHAO BIN v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
18 May 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGMC 59
Public Prosecutor v Bill Tan Keng Hwee
11 May 2026
SGMC
[2026] SGHC 99
HABEEB ZALEENA D/O PALLIVILAKAM KADER HABEEB MOHAMED v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
8 May 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 95
HO HUI MIN v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
5 May 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGDC 157
Public Prosecutor v Teh Mui Eng Judy
4 May 2026
SGDC

Methodology & disclaimer

Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. The Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the firm and lawyer lists because it appears as the public prosecutor, not as engaged defence counsel. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.