Leading Criminal Law Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

206 reported cases · January 2023 to June 2026

Updated

What did Singapore courts decide in Criminal Law?

Singapore courts issued 206 reported Criminal Law judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (171), of the 87 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Appeal dismissed (42), the median monetary award recorded was $92,500. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.

Reported cases 206 (2023–2026)
By year 2026 (32) · 2025 (52) · 2024 (61) · 2023 (61)
By court SGHC (171) · SGCA (34) · SGMC (1)
Outcomes (87 parseable) Appeal dismissed (42) · Convicted (16) · Sentence imposed (12) · Appeal allowed (8) · Acquitted (4) · Application dismissed (3) · Application allowed (2)
Median monetary award $92,500 (across 2 awards)
Most active counsel Eugene Singarajah Thuraisingam (8) · Anandan Bala (7) · David Menon (6) · Suang Wijaya (6) · Andre Darius Jumabhoy (5)

Compiled from 206 reported Criminal Law judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.

Outcome data updated

Across 206 reported Criminal Law judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to June 2026), Eugene Thuraisingam LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (18 cases), Eugene Singarajah Thuraisingam is the most active lawyer (10 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.

Overview

Criminal Law appears in 206 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Statutory offences — Misuse of Drugs Act (42), Appeal (26) and Offences — Sexual offences (24). The most active judge by reported case count is Vincent Hoong (44 cases) and the most active firm is Eugene Thuraisingam LLP (18 cases).

Which law firms handle the most Criminal Law cases in Singapore?

Eugene Thuraisingam LLP leads in Criminal Law with 18 cases between January 2023 and June 2026, followed by Drew & Napier LLC (12 cases) and Allen & Gledhill LLP (9 cases). 157 firms appeared in Criminal Law cases during this period.

Who are the leading Criminal Law lawyers in Singapore?

Eugene Singarajah Thuraisingam is the most active Criminal Law lawyer in Singapore with 10 case appearances between January 2023 and June 2026, followed by Anandan Bala (9) and Suang Wijaya (8).

Which judges handle the most Criminal Law cases in Singapore?

Vincent Hoong has handled 44 Criminal Law cases between January 2023 and June 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Tay Yong Kwang (41 cases) and Sundaresh Menon (35 cases) are also among the most active.

How many Criminal Law cases are reported in Singapore courts?

206 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Criminal Law, most often decided by Vincent Hoong.

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Criminal Law cases?

The main sub-topics are Statutory offences — Misuse of Drugs Act (42), Appeal (26) and Offences — Sexual offences (24).

Case Volume by Year

61
23
61
24
52
25
32
26
2023–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Key Statutes

cited in 133 cases
Penal Code (Cap 224)
cited in 130 cases
cited in 54 cases
cited in 51 cases
cited in 18 cases
cited in 16 cases
cited in 14 cases
cited in 14 cases
cited in 13 cases
cited in 9 cases
cited in 5 cases
Films Act
cited in 5 cases
Customs Act
cited in 5 cases
Prisons Act
cited in 4 cases

Guides & Data

Court Distribution

Cases

Page 8 of 9
[2023] SGHC 173
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Tristan Tan Yi Rui
21 June 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 170
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Yogesswaran C Manogaran & Anor
19 June 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 169
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v CEJ
16 June 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 165
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Hashim Bin Ismail & 3 Ors
12 June 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGCA 18
LIM CHOON BENG v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
5 June 2023
SGCA
[2023] SGHC 157
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Yeo Liang Hou & Nagaiah Rao A/L Alumanar
29 May 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 155
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Muhammad Salihin Bin Ismail
25 May 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 146
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Zin Mar Nwe
18 May 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGCA 15
Muhammad Faizal Bin Mohd Shariff v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
16 May 2023
SGCA
[2023] SGHC 142
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Mustaqim Bin Abdul Kadir
16 May 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 136
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Tan Yew Sin
12 May 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 130
TEO CHU HA @ HENRY TEO v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
9 May 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 123
XU YUANCHEN v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
4 May 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGCA 14
Dzulkarnain Bin Khamis v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
27 April 2023
SGCA
[2023] SGCA 12
Abdoll Mutaleb Bin Raffik v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
26 April 2023
SGCA
[2023] SGCA 13
TANGARAJU S/O SUPPIAH v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
25 April 2023
SGCA
[2023] SGHC 109
VIJAY KUMAR v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
21 April 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 95
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Low Sze Song & Sivaprakash Krishnan
14 April 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 93
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v TAN CHEE BENG
13 April 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 74
LOH SIANG PIOW @ LOH CHAN PEW v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
30 March 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 60
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Lokman Bin Abdul Rahman & Anor
17 March 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 62
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v RIZUWAN BIN ROHMAT
17 March 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGCA 9
A Steven s/o Paul Raj v Public Prosecutor
28 February 2023
SGCA
[2023] SGCA 8
TANGARAJU S/O SUPPIAH v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
23 February 2023
SGCA
[2023] SGHC 41
HALEEM BATHUSA BIN ABDUL RAHIM v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
22 February 2023
SGHC

Methodology & disclaimer

Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. The Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the firm and lawyer lists because it appears as the public prosecutor, not as engaged defence counsel. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.