Leading Trusts Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

95 reported cases · January 2023 to October 2026

Updated

What did Singapore courts decide in Trusts?

Singapore courts issued 95 reported Trusts judgments (2023–2026), most in SGHC (70), of the 23 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Appeal dismissed (8), one monetary award was recorded, of $2,319,484. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.

Reported cases 95 (2023–2026)
By year 2026 (18) · 2025 (23) · 2024 (17) · 2023 (37)
By court SGHC (70) · SGHC(A) (14) · SGHCF (3) · SGCA (2) · SGDC (2) · SGHCR (2) · SGCA(I) (1) · SGHC(I) (1)
Outcomes (23 parseable) Appeal dismissed (8) · Appeal allowed in part (3) · Application allowed (3) · Application dismissed (3) · Claim dismissed (3) · Appeal allowed (2) · Claim allowed (1)
Monetary award $2,319,484
Most active counsel Jaikanth Shankar (7) · Thio Shen Yi (5) · Woo Shu Yan (5) · Koh Li Qun Kelvin (Xu Liqun) (4) · Koh Swee Yen (4)

Compiled from 95 reported Trusts judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.

Outcome data updated

Across 95 reported Trusts judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to October 2026), Drew & Napier LLC is the most active firm by reported case count (19 cases), Jaikanth Shankar is the most active lawyer (7 case appearances). The lists below count how often named firms and lawyers appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.

Overview

Trusts appears in 95 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Constructive trusts (16), Resulting trusts (13) and Resulting trusts — Presumed resulting trusts (13). The most active firm is Drew & Napier LLC (19 cases).

Which law firms handle the most Trusts cases in Singapore?

Drew & Napier LLC leads in Trusts with 19 cases between January 2023 and October 2026, followed by WongPartnership LLP (13 cases). 123 firms appeared in Trusts cases during this period.

Who are the leading Trusts lawyers in Singapore?

Jaikanth Shankar is the most active Trusts lawyer in Singapore with 7 case appearances between January 2023 and October 2026, followed by Thio Shen Yi (5) and Woo Shu Yan (5).

Which judges handle the most Trusts cases in Singapore?

Kannan Ramesh (9 cases), Hri Kumar Nair (9 cases) and Woo Bih Li (9 cases) appear on the bench in reported Trusts cases between January 2023 and October 2026.

How many Trusts cases are reported in Singapore courts?

95 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Trusts.

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Trusts cases?

The main sub-topics are Constructive trusts (16), Resulting trusts (13) and Resulting trusts — Presumed resulting trusts (13).

Case Volume by Year

37
23
17
24
23
25
18
26
2023–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Constructive trusts — Nature of constructive trust — Whether “Class 1” or “Class 2” constructive trust 1 case

Protector — Whether term for protectors to resolve conflicts void and unenforceable 1 case

Resulting trusts — Presumed resulting trusts — Whether claimants proved payment of purchase price 1 case

Resulting trusts — Presumed resulting trusts — Whether claimants proved absence of intention to benefit registered owners 1 case

Constructive trusts — Pallant v Morgan equity 1 case

Key Statutes

cited in 29 cases
cited in 16 cases
cited in 15 cases
cited in 12 cases
cited in 12 cases
Trustees Act (Cap 337)
cited in 9 cases
Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 9 cases
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 8 cases
cited in 6 cases
cited in 4 cases
cited in 4 cases
Insolvency Act
cited in 3 cases
cited in 3 cases
Law of Property Act
cited in 2 cases
cited in 2 cases

Court Distribution

Cases

Page 4 of 4
[2023] SGHC 171
David Haw Wan Sin & Anor v Wendy Kwek Siang Ling & 6 Ors
20 June 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 162
HENRY QUEK PENG HOCK v CHIA SWEE HUN
1 June 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC(I) 9
BIDZINA IVANISHVILI & 4 Ors v CREDIT SUISSE TRUST LIMITED
26 May 2023
SGHC(I)
[2023] SGHC 121
TAN CHWEE LIAN v NG PEH WAH
10 May 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 115
HO WOON CHUN (ADMINISTRATRIX of the Estate of Ho Fook Tuck, Deceased) v WANG KAI QING
2 May 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 108
KUA SWEE LIN v HO KIM YAN & Anor
25 April 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 105
WONG SHU KIAT & Anor v CHEN JINPING, MICHELLE & Anor
20 April 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 91
APPANGAM GOVINDHASAMY & 3 Ors v SALAYA KALAIRANI & Anor
6 April 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 90
HO SOO TONG & 2 Ors v HO SOO FONG & 2 Ors
6 April 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC(A) 12
Ong Chin Woon v Ong Bee Hah & 7 Ors
5 April 2023
SGHC(A)
[2023] SGHC 80
LIANG XIHONG v LOONG SOO MIN & Anor
31 March 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 73
WANG XIAOPU v KOH MUI LEE & 2 Ors
29 March 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 58
ER KOK YONG (YU GUORONG) v TAN CHENG CHENG (CHENG QINGQING) (AS CO-ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF SPENCER TUPPANI) & 2 Ors
10 March 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGCA(I) 2
TAMAR PERRY & Anor v JACQUES HENRI GEORGES ESCULIER & Anor
2 March 2023
SGCA(I)
[2023] SGHC 47
LAKSHMI ANIL SALGAOCAR suing as the Administratrix of the ESTATE OF ANIL VASSUDEVA SALGAOCAR, deceased & Anor v DARSAN JITENDRA JHAVERI & 13 Ors
28 February 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 38
ER KOK YONG (YU GUORONG) & Anor v TAN CHENG CHENG (CHENG QINGQING) (AS CO-ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF SPENCER TUPPANI) & 2 Ors
17 February 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC(A) 8
SAFIE BIN JANTAN v ZAITON BINTE ADOM & Anor
8 February 2023
SGHC(A)
[2023] SGHC 22
CHENG AO v YONG NJO SIONG
31 January 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 12
B HIGH HOUSE INTERNATIONAL PTE LTD v MCDP PHOENIX SERVICES PTE LTD & Anor
17 January 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 6
KOTAGARALAHALLI PEDDAPPAIAH NAGARAJA v MOUSSA SALEM & 2 Ors
6 January 2023
SGHC

Methodology & disclaimer

Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.