Leading Insolvency Law Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

177 reported cases · January 2023 to September 2026

Updated

What did Singapore courts decide in Insolvency Law?

Singapore courts issued 177 reported Insolvency Law judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (128), of the 43 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Appeal dismissed (16), the median monetary award recorded was $57,500. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.

Reported cases 177 (2023–2026)
By year 2026 (31) · 2025 (43) · 2024 (60) · 2023 (43)
By court SGHC (128) · SGCA (22) · SGHCR (16) · SGHC(A) (5) · SGHC(I) (5) · SGHCF (1)
Outcomes (43 parseable) Appeal dismissed (16) · Appeal allowed (7) · Application dismissed (6) · Application granted (5) · Application allowed (3) · Appeal allowed in part (2) · Application allowed in part (1) · Claim allowed (1) · Claim allowed in part (1) · Convicted (1)
Median monetary award $57,500 (across 6 awards)

Compiled from 177 reported Insolvency Law judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.

Outcome data updated

Across 177 reported Insolvency Law judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to September 2026), Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (30 cases), Han Guangyuan Keith is the most active lawyer (13 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.

Overview

Insolvency Law appears in 177 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Cross-border insolvency — Recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings (8), Avoidance of transactions — Transactions at an undervalue (8) and Winding up — Grounds for petition (7). The most active judge by reported case count is Goh Yihan (36 cases) and the most active firm is Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (30 cases).

Which law firms handle the most Insolvency Law cases in Singapore?

Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP leads in Insolvency Law with 30 cases between January 2023 and September 2026, followed by Allen & Gledhill LLP (29 cases) and Shook Lin & Bok LLP (28 cases). 146 firms appeared in Insolvency Law cases during this period.

Who are the leading Insolvency Law lawyers in Singapore?

Han Guangyuan Keith is the most active Insolvency Law lawyer in Singapore with 13 case appearances between January 2023 and September 2026, followed by Lye Yu Min (9) and Yeo Alexander Lawrence Han Tiong (8).

Which judges handle the most Insolvency Law cases in Singapore?

Goh Yihan has handled 36 Insolvency Law cases between January 2023 and September 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Kannan Ramesh (20 cases) and Sundaresh Menon (16 cases) are also among the most active.

How many Insolvency Law cases are reported in Singapore courts?

177 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Insolvency Law, most often decided by Goh Yihan.

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Insolvency Law cases?

The main sub-topics are Cross-border insolvency — Recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings (8), Avoidance of transactions — Transactions at an undervalue (8) and Winding up — Grounds for petition (7).

Case Volume by Year

43
23
60
24
43
25
31
26
2023–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Key Statutes

Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 163 cases
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 162 cases
cited in 91 cases
cited in 36 cases
Insolvency Act
cited in 16 cases
cited in 14 cases
cited in 13 cases
cited in 12 cases
cited in 9 cases
cited in 8 cases
UK Insolvency Act
cited in 8 cases
cited in 6 cases
cited in 6 cases
Australian Corporations Act
cited in 6 cases
cited in 5 cases

Court Distribution

Cases

Page 3 of 8
[2025] SGHC 104
JOSHUA JAMES TAYLOR & ANOR
4 June 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHCR 17
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD v SOH KENG CHEANG PHILIP
29 May 2025
SGHCR
[2025] SGHC 97
PARK HOTEL GROUP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD. v AW ENG HAI & 2 Ors
23 May 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 88
Shim Wai Han v Lai Seng Kwoon & Anor
13 May 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHCR 13
CHEN WEIWEN KELVIN v DBS BANK LTD & Anor
8 May 2025
SGHCR
[2025] SGHC 74
KOH LIN YEE (XU RENYI) v OVERSEA-CHINESE BANKING CORPORATION LIMITED
30 April 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHCR 11
DBS BANK LTD v LI YUAN
30 April 2025
SGHCR
[2025] SGHCR 10
Sun Quan v AI MTBL SPV, LLC
30 April 2025
SGHCR
[2025] SGCA 19
AFFERT RESOURCES PTE. LTD. (IN COURT COMPULSORY WINDING UP) v INDUSTRIES CHIMIQUES DU SENEGAL & Anor
30 April 2025
SGCA
[2025] SGHCR 6
Re: HO SALLY
23 April 2025
SGHCR
[2025] SGHC 68
WHITE OAK TRADE FINANCE ASSETCO 1, LLC v RHODIUM INTERNATIONAL TRADING USA, INC.
11 April 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 67
KING & WOOD MALLESONS
11 April 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHCR 4
MAYBANK SINGAPORE LIMITED v ELAVARASAN S/O MANOHARAN
7 April 2025
SGHCR
[2025] SGHC 52
WONG JOO WAN v LIM SIONG HENG, RAYMOND & Anor
27 March 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 49
Compuage Infocom Limited & Anor
24 March 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGCA 13
SAPURA FABRICATION SDN. BHD. & 3 Ors v GAS
21 March 2025
SGCA
[2025] SGCA 11
Lau Yean Liang, Raymond v JASON ALEKSANDER KARDACHI & Anor
13 March 2025
SGCA
[2025] SGHC 39
Java Asset Holding Ltd v Sin David
10 March 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC(I) 5
QUOINE PTE. LTD. & 2 Ors
26 February 2025
SGHC(I)
[2025] SGHC(I) 4
TERRAFORM LABS PTE. LTD.
21 February 2025
SGHC(I)
[2025] SGHC 27
SME CARE PTE LTD v Jannie Chan Siew Lee
19 February 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 23
FXA INVESTMENT HOLDINGS PTE. LTD. v TAN WEI CHEONG (CHEN WEIZHANG) & 2 Ors
12 February 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 21
MAYBANK SINGAPORE LIMITED v PAPA BAKERZ PTE. LTD.
10 February 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGCA 3
CH BIOVEST PTE. LTD. v ENVY ASSET MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION) & 3 Ors
4 February 2025
SGCA
[2024] SGHC 328
Re: LIM OON KUIN
30 December 2024
SGHC

Methodology & disclaimer

Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.