Leading Companies Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore
110 reported cases · January 2023 to October 2026
Updated
What did Singapore courts decide in Companies?
Singapore courts issued 110 reported Companies judgments (2023–2026), most in the High Court (83), the median monetary award recorded was $30,000. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.
Compiled from 110 reported Companies judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.
Outcome data updated
Across 110 reported Companies judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to October 2026), Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (22 cases), Sim Chong is the most active lawyer (7 case appearances). The lists below count how often named firms and lawyers appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.
Overview
Companies appears in 110 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Directors — Duties (12), Oppression — Minority shareholders (8) and Incorporation of companies — Lifting corporate veil (6). The most active judge by reported case count is Hri Kumar Nair (11 cases) and the most active firm is Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (22 cases).
Which law firms handle the most Companies cases in Singapore?
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP leads in Companies with 22 cases between January 2023 and October 2026, followed by Drew & Napier LLC (19 cases) and Allen & Gledhill LLP (17 cases). 133 firms appeared in Companies cases during this period.
Who are the leading Companies lawyers in Singapore?
Sim Chong is the most active Companies lawyer in Singapore with 7 case appearances between January 2023 and October 2026, followed by Alston Yeong (6).
Which judges handle the most Companies cases in Singapore?
Hri Kumar Nair has handled 11 Companies cases between January 2023 and October 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Kannan Ramesh (10 cases) follows.
How many Companies cases are reported in Singapore courts?
110 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Companies, most often decided by Hri Kumar Nair.
What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Companies cases?
The main sub-topics are Directors — Duties (12), Oppression — Minority shareholders (8) and Incorporation of companies — Lifting corporate veil (6).
Case Volume by Year
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
Directors — Duties 12 cases
-
Hri Kumar Nair J found the defendants liable on almost all of the claims, so the claim was allowed in part.
High Court · 6 August 2025 · [2025] SGHC 149 -
Mohamed Faizal JC allowed the liquidators' claims in part.
High Court · 29 July 2025 · [2025] SGHC 143 -
The court allowed the appeal of SRK and TJCI (AD 22) and dismissed JGJ's appeal (AD 21), holding JGJ liable for the full invoiced sums with interest at 5.33% per annum, and varied the costs reduction…
High Court (Appellate Division) · 6 March 2025 · [2025] SGHC(A) 5 -
The court dismissed Ms Chan's applications in SUM 4315 and SUM 4316, leaving the trustee's admissions of SME's proof and of the Jannie Sum and loan repayment in place.
High Court · 19 February 2025 · [2025] SGHC 27 -
The High Court allowed the claim in part, finding Mr Ong in breach of his fiduciary duties and his company liable in knowing receipt, with both liable in unlawful means conspiracy.
High Court · 17 December 2024 · [2024] SGHC 324 - + 7 more cases
Incorporation of companies — Lifting corporate veil 6 cases
-
The court allowed the claims in part.
High Court · 14 August 2026 · [2026] SGHC 166 -
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal.
Court of Appeal · 15 May 2024 · [2024] SGCA 15 -
The High Court allowed the claim in part.
High Court · 30 April 2024 · [2024] SGHC 110 -
The court dismissed all the plaintiffs' claims against LPQ and HXD, ordering costs to be agreed or taxed.
High Court · 15 February 2024 · [2024] SGHC 44 -
Lee Seiu Kin J allowed the claim in part.
High Court · 12 May 2023 · [2023] SGHC 139 - + 1 more case
Receiver and manager — Judicial management order 4 cases
-
The High Court dismissed the company's moratorium application with costs and allowed ArcelorMittal's application, ordering that the company be placed under judicial management with Mr Cameron Lindsay…
High Court · 28 April 2025 · [2025] SGHC 77 -
Hri Kumar Nair J allowed the judicial management application, dismissed Delta's registrar's appeal and its IRDA summons with costs to be paid by Delta to Gulf International, and made no order on the…
High Court · 24 May 2023 · [2023] SGHC 151 -
The court allowed the application on 15 March 2023 and placed the company under judicial management, holding that the company was likely to become unable to pay its debts and that a judicial…
High Court · 5 May 2023 · [2023] SGHC 122 -
The court dismissed both Originating Application No 873 of 2022 and Originating Application No 883 of 2022.
High Court · 24 February 2023 · [2023] SGHC 43
Directors — Removal 3 cases
-
The District Court dismissed the claim.
District Court · 5 October 2026 · [2026] SGDC 328 -
Philip Jeyaretnam J allowed the claim in OC 301.
High Court · 19 January 2024 · [2024] SGHC 13 -
The High Court allowed the claim and the counterclaim each in part.
High Court · 15 August 2023 · [2023] SGHC 211
Winding up 3 cases
-
The High Court dismissed AQCEL's application in CWU 23 and allowed LHG's application in CWU 60, ordering that LIH be wound up on just and equitable grounds and appointing LHG's liquidators as joint…
High Court · 30 June 2026 · [2026] SGHC 138 -
The Court of Appeal allowed TJS's appeal in CA 3 of 2024 and dismissed TYH's appeal in CA 22 of 2023.
Court of Appeal · 7 August 2024 · [2024] SGCA 27 -
Philip Jeyaretnam J allowed the claim in OC 301.
High Court · 19 January 2024 · [2024] SGHC 13
Members — Meetings 3 cases
-
Chua Lee Ming J allowed the application in part.
High Court · 6 May 2026 · [2026] SGHC 96 -
Valerie Thean J dismissed both OA 637 and SUM 2196.
High Court · 9 January 2024 · [2024] SGHC 1 -
Valerie Thean J dismissed the convening shareholders' application in OA 855, including an alternative prayer for directions under s 182, and in the company's application in OA 861 granted a…
High Court · 12 December 2023 · [2023] SGHC 351
Oppression 3 cases
-
The High Court dismissed the claim in its entirety, finding that the claimants had not proved breach of the founding agreement, misrepresentation or minority oppression on a balance of probabilities.
High Court · 10 April 2026 · [2026] SGHC 81 -
The High Court allowed the claim in part, finding commercial unfairness in Mr Singh's breaches of the understanding but not in the other acts alleged.
High Court · 6 May 2024 · [2024] SGHC 117 -
Chua Lee Ming J dismissed all of Sandy's claims in S 275 and all of Sam's claims in S 345.
High Court · 31 March 2023 · [2023] SGHC 80
Accounts 3 cases
-
The Court of Appeal (Sundaresh Menon CJ delivering the judgment, with Steven Chong JCA, Belinda Ang Saw Ean JCA, Kannan Ramesh JAD and Judith Prakash SJ) dismissed the appeal.
Court of Appeal · 27 March 2024 · [2024] SGCA 10 -
The Appellate Division (Woo Bih Li JAD, Debbie Ong Siew Ling JAD and Valerie Thean J), in an ex tempore judgment, granted Summons No 32 of 2023 and dismissed the appeal.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 19 September 2023 · [2023] SGHC(A) 31 -
The court allowed all three applications and granted an order in terms of each.
High Court · 5 April 2023 · [2023] SGHC 84
Statutory derivative action — Section 216A of the Companies Act 1967 (2020 Rev Ed) — Whether complainant was acting in good faith 2 cases
-
The Appellate Division dismissed the appeal, so Vivaz was refused permission to bring the derivative action.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 30 July 2026 · [2026] SGHC(A) 20 -
The High Court dismissed Vivaz's application for leave to bring a derivative action, finding that it had not acted in good faith.
High Court · 4 September 2025 · [2025] SGHC 176
Directors — Resignation 2 cases
-
Chua Lee Ming J allowed the application in part.
High Court · 6 May 2026 · [2026] SGHC 96 -
The Appellate Division dismissed the appeal on 27 April 2023, deciding it on the facts and later gave its grounds.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 15 May 2023 · [2023] SGHC(A) 19
Statutory derivative action 2 cases
-
The High Court granted the application, permitting Vivaz to file the protective writ on condition that it not be served on the potential defendants pending the appeal, and allowed an oral application…
High Court · 14 October 2025 · [2025] SGHC 202 -
The High Court allowed the claim on behalf of the Company against the Defendant, finding that the Company was entitled to the disputed sum, and ordered the Defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs, to…
High Court · 9 February 2023 · [2023] SGHC 30
Directors — Duties — Breach of director’s duties 2 cases
-
Hri Kumar Nair J allowed the claims in part.
High Court · 16 December 2024 · [2024] SGHC 322 -
The High Court dismissed all of Duke Bakery's claims against the three defendants and dismissed Mdm Chng's counterclaim.
High Court · 13 December 2024 · [2024] SGHC 318
Directors — Shadow directors 2 cases
-
The High Court dismissed the company's claim and allowed Mr Liew's counterclaim, giving him judgment for the undisputed sum of $719,000 and costs of $150,000 inclusive of disbursements.
High Court · 25 September 2024 · [2024] SGHC 246 -
Mavis Chionh Sze Chyi J dismissed the plaintiffs' oppression and conspiracy claims in their entirety.
High Court · 29 December 2023 · [2023] SGHC 361
Receiver and manager — Judicial management order — Whether judicial management order should be extended 2 cases
-
Goh Yihan J allowed the application in part.
High Court · 13 May 2024 · [2024] SGHC 127 -
The High Court allowed the application, extending the judicial management order and the judicial manager's appointment, and extending the time for him to put forward the statement of proposals.
High Court · 23 February 2024 · [2024] SGHC 48
Memorandum and articles of association 2 cases
-
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, upholding the permanent injunctions and other final relief, with costs to the respondents in the aggregate sum of $30,000 all-in.
Court of Appeal · 22 March 2024 · [2024] SGCA 9 -
The High Court allowed the plaintiffs' application for final relief against the first and third defendants.
High Court · 23 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 297
Directors — Inspection of accounting records 2 cases
-
The Appellate Division (Woo Bih Li JAD, Debbie Ong Siew Ling JAD and Valerie Thean J), in an ex tempore judgment, granted Summons No 32 of 2023 and dismissed the appeal.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 19 September 2023 · [2023] SGHC(A) 31 -
The court allowed all three applications and granted an order in terms of each.
High Court · 5 April 2023 · [2023] SGHC 84
Schemes of arrangement — Whether a moratorium should be granted 2 cases
-
The High Court allowed the application in part.
High Court · 18 August 2023 · [2023] SGHC 231 -
The High Court allowed the amendment application in Summons No 1114 of 2023 and dismissed the moratorium application in Originating Application No 350 of 2023, holding that neither the procedural nor…
High Court · 17 May 2023 · [2023] SGHC 148
Receiver and manager — Judicial management order — Appointment of interim judicial manager 1 case
-
The High Court allowed the application in HC/SUM 2669/2026 and ordered that three insolvency practitioners of KPMG Services Pte Ltd be appointed joint and several interim judicial managers of the…
High Court · 25 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC 200
Schemes of arrangement — Classification of creditors — Use of administrative convenience class 1 case
-
The court allowed the application and granted OA 16 in its entirety, sanctioning the scheme of arrangement.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 24 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC(I) 22
Schemes of arrangement — Departure from default procedure under Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution (Proofs of Debt in Schemes of Arrangement) Regulations 2020 — Power under s 68(14)(a) of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 (2020 Rev Ed) 1 case
-
The court allowed the application and granted OA 16 in its entirety, sanctioning the scheme of arrangement.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 24 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC(I) 22
Capacity — Indoor management rule — Whether the Respondent was bound to the contract for renovation works that did not contain its director’s signature and company chop 1 case
-
The tribunal allowed the claim in full.
Small Claims Tribunal · 17 September 2026 · [2026] SGSCT 23
Oppression — Appropriate relief 1 case
-
The SICC allowed SH BVI's oppression claim in part.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 17 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC(I) 20
Statutory derivative action — Lack of candour — Whether action brought for collateral purpose at expense of company — Whether action brought in good faith — Section 216A(3)(b) Companies Act (2020 Rev Ed) 1 case
-
The High Court dismissed RedDot's application for permission to bring a derivative action, finding the proposed action was not prima facie in the interests of GSC Singapore and that good faith had…
High Court · 15 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC 187
Key Statutes
Court Distribution
Cases
Page 1 of 5-
The District Court dismissed the claim.
District Court · 5 October 2026 · [2026] SGDC 328 -
The High Court allowed the application in HC/SUM 2669/2026 and ordered that three insolvency practitioners of KPMG Services Pte Ltd be appointed joint and several interim judicial managers of the…
High Court · 25 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC 200 -
The court allowed the application and granted OA 16 in its entirety, sanctioning the scheme of arrangement.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 24 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC(I) 22 -
The tribunal allowed the claim in full.
Small Claims Tribunal · 17 September 2026 · [2026] SGSCT 23 -
The SICC allowed SH BVI's oppression claim in part.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 17 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC(I) 20 -
The High Court dismissed RedDot's application for permission to bring a derivative action, finding the proposed action was not prima facie in the interests of GSC Singapore and that good faith had…
High Court · 15 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC 187 -
The court allowed the application and set aside the Mareva injunction and other orders against Courtwell, save for permission to serve out of jurisdiction, and ended the receivership.
High Court · 31 August 2026 · [2026] SGHC 177 -
The court allowed the claims in part.
High Court · 14 August 2026 · [2026] SGHC 166 -
The Appellate Division dismissed the appeal, so Vivaz was refused permission to bring the derivative action.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 30 July 2026 · [2026] SGHC(A) 20 -
The High Court allowed Mr Goh's oppression claim and ordered Mr Yeo to buy out all his shares in the group companies at a price fixed by an independent valuer as at the date of judgment, applying a…
High Court · 29 July 2026 · [2026] SGHC 157 -
The Assistant Registrar allowed Courtwell's application, setting aside the order for service out of jurisdiction, the order for substituted service and the service effected, because none of the three…
High Court Registrar · 29 July 2026 · [2026] SGHCR 28 -
The court granted the application and sanctioned the scheme as voted on by the scheme creditors at the scheme meeting, without either of the alterations MAI sought.
High Court · 17 July 2026 · [2026] SGHC 150 -
The High Court dismissed AQCEL's application in CWU 23 and allowed LHG's application in CWU 60, ordering that LIH be wound up on just and equitable grounds and appointing LHG's liquidators as joint…
High Court · 30 June 2026 · [2026] SGHC 138 -
The court allowed the claims in part and dismissed Prisma's counterclaims.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 25 June 2026 · [2026] SGHC(I) 8 -
The High Court allowed OA 183 on 4 March 2026, granting Zhuang permission to bring proceedings in the companies' names against Huang for breaches of fiduciary and other duties and giving him full…
High Court · 15 June 2026 · [2026] SGHC 127 -
Sushil Nair J allowed the claim in part.
High Court · 26 May 2026 · [2026] SGHC 117 -
Chua Lee Ming J allowed the application in part.
High Court · 6 May 2026 · [2026] SGHC 96 -
The High Court dismissed the claim in its entirety, finding that the claimants had not proved breach of the founding agreement, misrepresentation or minority oppression on a balance of probabilities.
High Court · 10 April 2026 · [2026] SGHC 81 -
Philip Jeyaretnam J allowed the application in part.
High Court · 7 April 2026 · [2026] SGHC 74 -
The judge dismissed the winding up application and fixed costs at $12,000 all-in, payable by Mr Lim to Mr Koh.
High Court · 13 February 2026 · [2026] SGHC 35 -
The High Court dismissed the moratorium application.
High Court · 23 December 2025 · [2025] SGHC 259 -
The court allowed the application and granted the four-month moratorium in the terms sought, with added directions: monthly email updates to all creditors on the status of negotiations with Hildrics,…
High Court · 10 December 2025 · [2025] SGHC 251 -
The High Court granted the application, permitting Vivaz to file the protective writ on condition that it not be served on the potential defendants pending the appeal, and allowed an oral application…
High Court · 14 October 2025 · [2025] SGHC 202 -
The High Court granted the claimant permission to discontinue the originating application and ordered no order as to costs, as the parties asked.
High Court · 22 September 2025 · [2025] SGHC 190 -
The High Court dismissed Vivaz's application for leave to bring a derivative action, finding that it had not acted in good faith.
High Court · 4 September 2025 · [2025] SGHC 176
Methodology & disclaimer
Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Singapore court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.