Leading Criminal Procedure and Sentencing Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

326 reported cases · January 2023 to October 2026

Updated

What did Singapore courts decide in Criminal Procedure and Sentencing?

Singapore courts issued 326 reported Criminal Procedure and Sentencing judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (188), of the 136 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Appeal dismissed (48), the median monetary award recorded was $3,250. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.

Reported cases 326 (2023–2026)
By year 2026 (124) · 2025 (62) · 2024 (67) · 2023 (73)
By court SGHC (188) · SGCA (71) · SGDC (48) · SGMC (13) · SGHCF (4) · SGYC (2)
Outcomes (136 parseable) Appeal dismissed (48) · Sentence imposed (22) · Application dismissed (19) · Appeal allowed (18) · Convicted (16) · Appeal allowed in part (8) · Application allowed (2) · Acquitted (1) · Application granted (1) · Application refused (1)
Median monetary award $3,250 (across 6 awards)
Most active counsel Wong Woon Kwong (12) · Ashvin Hariharan (10) · Anandan Bala (9) · Jiang Ke-Yue (9) · Suang Wijaya (9)

Compiled from 326 reported Criminal Procedure and Sentencing judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.

Outcome data updated

Across 326 reported Criminal Procedure and Sentencing judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to October 2026), Drew & Napier LLC is the most active firm by reported case count (12 cases), Wong Woon Kwong is the most active lawyer (12 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.

Overview

Criminal Procedure and Sentencing appears in 326 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Sentencing (48), Sentencing — Appeals (46) and Appeal (23). The most active judge by reported case count is Tay Yong Kwang (66 cases) and the most active firm is Drew & Napier LLC (12 cases).

Which law firms handle the most Criminal Procedure and Sentencing cases in Singapore?

Drew & Napier LLC leads in Criminal Procedure and Sentencing with 12 cases between January 2023 and October 2026, followed by Eugene Thuraisingam LLP (11 cases) and Allen & Gledhill LLP (9 cases). 171 firms appeared in Criminal Procedure and Sentencing cases during this period.

Who are the leading Criminal Procedure and Sentencing lawyers in Singapore?

Wong Woon Kwong is the most active Criminal Procedure and Sentencing lawyer in Singapore with 12 case appearances between January 2023 and October 2026, followed by Ashvin Hariharan (10) and Suang Wijaya (9).

Which judges handle the most Criminal Procedure and Sentencing cases in Singapore?

Tay Yong Kwang has handled 66 Criminal Procedure and Sentencing cases between January 2023 and October 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Sundaresh Menon (54 cases) and Vincent Hoong (53 cases) are also among the most active.

How many Criminal Procedure and Sentencing cases are reported in Singapore courts?

326 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Criminal Procedure and Sentencing, most often decided by Tay Yong Kwang.

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Criminal Procedure and Sentencing cases?

The main sub-topics are Sentencing (48), Sentencing — Appeals (46) and Appeal (23).

Case Volume by Year

73
23
67
24
62
25
124
26
2023–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Criminal review — Application for permission to make review application — Section 394H of the Criminal Procedure Code 2010 (2020 Rev Ed) 2 cases

Key Statutes

cited in 209 cases
Penal Code (Cap 224)
cited in 196 cases
cited in 85 cases
cited in 44 cases
cited in 35 cases
cited in 25 cases
cited in 25 cases
cited in 21 cases
Applications in Capital Cases Act
cited in 16 cases
Prisons Act
cited in 12 cases
cited in 12 cases
cited in 10 cases
cited in 10 cases
cited in 9 cases

Court Distribution

Cases

Page 2 of 14
[2026] SGDC 263
Tamara Sweren v Estate of the late Lawrence Solomon
20 August 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGCA 37
Dineshkumar Sambusivam v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
20 August 2026
SGCA
[2026] SGHC 170
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v DMB
18 August 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 168
TJHIN THIAN PO v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
17 August 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGDC 258
PP v JJE - [2026] SGDC 258
7 August 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGMC 93
Public Prosecutor v Ng Siew Teng
5 August 2026
SGMC
[2026] SGDC 255
Public Prosecutor v PSA Corporation Limited
4 August 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGDC 252
Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Fariz Bin Jamaluddin [2026] SGDC 252
29 July 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGCA 35
CFE v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
29 July 2026
SGCA
[2026] SGHC 152
TAN KAI YUAN v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
28 July 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGDC 239
Public Prosecutor v Hassan Putra Bin Suleiman
28 July 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGYC 3
Public Prosecutor v YFT
27 July 2026
SGYC
[2026] SGDC 238
Public Prosecutor v Tay Chun Hsiong and Fang Yih Uei
21 July 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGDC 234
Public Prosecutor v Ahmad Faraz
20 July 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGDC 222
Public Prosecutor v. Lee Jia Ming
9 July 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGHC 142
RACHMAT HIDAYAT BIN EDY JUJU v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
8 July 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGMC 85
Public Prosecutor v Chia Meng Chiang (Xie Mingchang) [2026] SGMC 85
6 July 2026
SGMC
[2026] SGDC 220
Public Prosecutor v Naufal Muzzammil s/o Jamal Mohamed [2026] SGDC 220
6 July 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGCA 31
LIM TEAN v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
6 July 2026
SGCA
[2026] SGDC 217
Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Farook s/o Mohamed Yusoof [2026] SGDC 217
3 July 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGCA 29
Gao Xiong v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
3 July 2026
SGCA
[2026] SGCA 30
Munusamy Ramarmurth v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
2 July 2026
SGCA
[2026] SGDC 212
PP v Indran Pillay 2026 SGDC 212
30 June 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGDC 211
Public Prosecutor v. Loh Guang Ze
30 June 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGDC 210
PP v Yeo Chee Hong
26 June 2026
SGDC

Methodology & disclaimer

Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. The Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the firm and lawyer lists because it appears as the public prosecutor, not as engaged defence counsel. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.